wired telecommunication carriers · Ohio

OH_Cincinnati_11315 Reed Hartman Hwy_SWRDHART

Cincinnati, OH · ~480 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.2
Avg TCR
0.7
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

OH_Cincinnati_11315 Reed Hartman Hwy_SWRDHART runs at 30% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical wired telecommunication carriers workplace, earning a grade A.

OH_Cincinnati_11315 Reed Hartman Hwy_SWRDHART: 0.2 TCR = 30% of wired telecommunication carriers BLS 0.7 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

OH_Cincinnati_11315 Reed Hartman Hwy_SWRDHART safety composite

OH_Cincinnati_11315 Reed Hartman Hwy_SWRDHART scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 89% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

79/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 0.21 per 100 workers

Safer than 89% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 88% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

OH_Cincinnati_11315 Reed Hartman Hwy_SWRDHART held a steady TCR band

OH_Cincinnati_11315 Reed Hartman Hwy_SWRDHART's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.2 in 2022 to 0.2 in 2023. In 2023, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2022=0.2 · 2023=0.2

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 517111 · Cincinnati, OH AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 0.2 · 30% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #3/13
  • PHOTO NC_Charlotte_8336 Fo…
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 2 inj
  • SIZE ~480 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: NC_Charlotte_8336 Forest Point Blvd_NC017900 (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Ohio employers → · Look up another →

OH_Cincinnati_11315 Reed Hartman Hwy_SWRDHART in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows OH_Cincinnati_11315 Reed Hartman Hwy_SWRDHART averages 0.2 TCR (30% of the wired telecommunication carriers BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

OH_Cincinnati_11315 Reed Hartman Hwy_SWRDHART TCR series: 2022=0.2 · 2023=0.2 · BLS 0.7

Where OH_Cincinnati_11315 Reed Hartman Hwy_SWRDHART falls in its industry

455 wired telecommunication carrie establishments

Safer than 89% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Ohio alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #3 safest of 13 wired telecommunication carrie employers in Ohio.

OH_Cincinnati_11315 Reed Hartman Hwy_SWRDHART (480 employees, TCR 0.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 515 employees and a TCR of 4.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,0002,500 0246 Average employees Total Case Rate OH_Cincinnati_11315 Reed Hartman Hwy_SWRDHART
OH_Cincinnati_11315 Reed Hartman Hwy_SWRDHART (480 employees, TCR 0.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 515 employees and a TCR of 4.0

OH_Cincinnati_11315 Reed Hartman Hwy_SWRDHART has fewer employees than the wired telecommunication carriers median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 0.2 0.0 1 0 0
2022 0.2 0.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

517111 · OH · Cincinnati

455 wired telecommunication carriers employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,650 rated employers in Ohio with headcount on file · 1,513 employers in Cincinnati, OH · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR NC_Charlotte_8336 Forest Point Blvd_NC017900 0.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR KY_Louisville_10300 Ormsby_call ctr_KC9030700 0.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR NC_Charlotte_7800 Crescent Executive Dr._TW140100 0.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR TN - Virtual - B - EST 0.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE Candle-lite, Company 480 FTE
STATE-SIZE Honeywell Intelligrated Installations 481 FTE
STATE-SIZE Alex Products, Inc, - Ridgeville Plant 481 FTE
STATE-SIZE Honeywell Aerospace - Urbana 481 FTE
CITY-NEAR Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center 17,011 FTE
CITY-NEAR Cincinnati Operations 10,239 FTE
CITY-NEAR Supply Chain : Evendale, OH 7,118 FTE
CITY-NEAR Supply Chain Evendale OH 6,400 FTE
NAT-TCR Dept. of Administration (2) 0.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Canon U.S.A.,Inc., Melville, NY 0.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Dept. of Corrections (20) 0.2 TCR
NAT-TCR FL021 0.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE Htpn / Tenet 480 FTE
NAT-SIZE Nucor Steel South Carolina (Darlington) 480 FTE
NAT-SIZE KSCYMOAU 480 FTE
NAT-SIZE Forks I 480 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.