Manufacturing building construction · New York

Oldcastle Building Envelope

Hauppauge, NY · ~94 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
1.7
Avg TCR
2.9
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Oldcastle Building Envelope runs at 58% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Manufacturing building construction workplace, earning a grade B.

Oldcastle Building Envelope: 1.7 TCR = 58% of Manufacturing building construction BLS 2.9 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Oldcastle Building Envelope safety composite

Oldcastle Building Envelope scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 34%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

44/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 1.67 per 100 workers

Safer than 49% of industry peers

DART rate
F 1.06 per 100 workers

Safer than 34% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−4.5

2019→2024

Oldcastle Building Envelope injury rate improved

Oldcastle Building Envelope's TCR fell 4.5 from 5.6 in 2019 to 1.1 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2019 at 5.6 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.63× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2019=5.6 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=0.5 · 2023=2.8 · 2024=1.1

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 236210 · Hauppauge, NY AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 1.7 · 58% of ind

  • DART 1.1 DART
  • RANK #12/29
  • PHOTO David A.Bush, Inc.
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 15 inj
  • SIZE ~94 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: David A.Bush, Inc. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · New York employers → · Look up another →

Oldcastle Building Envelope in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Oldcastle Building Envelope averages 1.7 TCR (58% of the Manufacturing building construction BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Oldcastle Building Envelope TCR series: 2019=5.6 · 2020=0 · 2021=0 · 2022=0.5 · 2023=2.8 · 2024=1.1 · BLS 2.9

Where Oldcastle Building Envelope falls in its industry

924 Manufacturing building constru establishments

Safer than 49% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to New York alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #12 safest of 29 Manufacturing building constru employers in New York.

Oldcastle Building Envelope (94 employees, TCR 1.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 71 employees and a TCR of 1.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Oldcastle Building Envelope
Oldcastle Building Envelope (94 employees, TCR 1.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 71 employees and a TCR of 1.6

Oldcastle Building Envelope has more employees than the Manufacturing building construction median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 1.1 1.1 1 0 0
2023 2.8 0.9 3 0 0
2022 0.5 0.2 3 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 1 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 5.6 4.8 7 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

236210 · NY · Hauppauge

924 Manufacturing building construction employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 21,008 rated employers in New York with headcount on file · 154 employers in Hauppauge, NY · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR David A.Bush, Inc. 1.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Anderson Construction 1.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Walter S. Johnson Building Co., Inc 1.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Bracken Construction Company, Inc. 1.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE Adirondack Farms LLC 94 FTE
STATE-SIZE E. 16th St 94 FTE
STATE-SIZE National Fuel Gas Distribution Tonawanda Servicenter 94 FTE
STATE-SIZE Studco Building Systems US, LLC - Webster, NY 94 FTE
CITY-NEAR Advance Care Alliance of NY HQ Hauppauge 990 FTE
CITY-NEAR Teachers Federal Credit Union 786 FTE
CITY-NEAR RECONN 9009 781 FTE
CITY-NEAR CONTRACT PHARMACAL CORP 691 FTE
NAT-TCR Jim Brisco Enterprises, Inc. 1.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Service Wire Company Culloden 1.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Ball Horticultural Company 1.7 TCR
NAT-TCR MH Louisville Switching 1.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE AELL-DHX3 94 FTE
NAT-SIZE Ozark Border Electric Cooperative 94 FTE
NAT-SIZE Mundet Tennessee Inc. 94 FTE
NAT-SIZE Leedstone, Inc. - Melrose 94 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.