Retreading materials, tire, manufacturing · North Carolina

Oliver Rubber Company

Asheboro, NC · ~170 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.3
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Oliver Rubber Company runs at 69% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Retreading materials, tire, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade B.

Oliver Rubber Company: 2.3 TCR = 69% of Retreading materials, tire, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Oliver Rubber Company safety composite

Oliver Rubber Company scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 65% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 34%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

51/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 2.29 per 100 workers

Safer than 65% of industry peers

DART rate
F 2.83 per 100 workers

Safer than 34% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 54% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−0.5

2016→2024

Oliver Rubber Company injury rate improved

Oliver Rubber Company's TCR fell 0.5 from 3.9 in 2016 to 3.4 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2016 at 3.9 TCR. In 2024, DART was 1.24× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=3.9 · 2017=2.5 · 2018=1.5 · 2019=2.1 · 2020=1.3 · 2021=2.5 · 2022=2.3 · 2023=1.1 · 2024=3.4

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 326211 · Asheboro, NC AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade B · TCR 2.3 · 69% of ind

  • DART 2.8 DART
  • RANK #2/9
  • PHOTO BFG3 Tuscaloosa Faci…
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 36 inj
  • SIZE ~170 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: BFG3 Tuscaloosa Facility (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · North Carolina employers → · Look up another →

Oliver Rubber Company in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Oliver Rubber Company averages 2.3 TCR (69% of the Retreading materials, tire, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Oliver Rubber Company TCR series: 2016=3.9 · 2017=2.5 · 2018=1.5 · 2019=2.1 · 2020=1.3 · 2021=2.5 · 2022=2.3 · 2023=1.1 · 2024=3.4 · BLS 3.3

Where Oliver Rubber Company falls in its industry

114 Retreading materials, tire, ma establishments

Safer than 65% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to North Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #2 safest of 9 Retreading materials, tire, ma employers in North Carolina.

Oliver Rubber Company (170 employees, TCR 2.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 393 employees and a TCR of 3.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Oliver Rubber Company
Oliver Rubber Company (170 employees, TCR 2.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 393 employees and a TCR of 3.2

Oliver Rubber Company has fewer employees than the Retreading materials, tire, manufacturin median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 3.4 2.8 6 0 0
2023 1.1 1.1 2 0 0
2022 2.3 2.3 4 0 0
2021 2.5 1.8 4 0 0
2020 1.3 0.7 2 0 0
2019 2.1 2.1 4 0 0
2018 1.5 1.5 3 0 0
2017 2.5 0.5 3 2 0
2016 3.9 2.4 8 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

326211 · NC · Asheboro

114 Retreading materials, tire, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,981 rated employers in North Carolina with headcount on file · 139 employers in Asheboro, NC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR BFG3 Tuscaloosa Facility 2.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Setco Tire 2.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Sumner, Wa. 2.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR The Carlstar Group,LLc 2.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE Sullivan Eastern, Inc 170 FTE
STATE-SIZE Clement Pappas NC LLC 170 FTE
STATE-SIZE Jacob Holm 170 FTE
STATE-SIZE Auria Albemarle 170 FTE
CITY-NEAR 8020236-Energizer/Asheboro 1,287 FTE
CITY-NEAR 8020236 Energizer Asheboro 654 FTE
CITY-NEAR Technimark, LLC Plant 5 633 FTE
CITY-NEAR Technimark LLC - Plant 5 466 FTE
NAT-TCR The United States Playing Card Company 2.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Century Manufacturing Inc 2.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Expert Optics 2.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Songbird Lodge 2.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE Nucor Steel Florida, Inc. 170 FTE
NAT-SIZE Plant 10 170 FTE
NAT-SIZE Eastern Architectural Systems 170 FTE
NAT-SIZE Embree Construction 170 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.