Screening, window, plastics, manufacturing · Florida

Eastern Architectural Systems

Fort Myers, FL · ~170 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
4.3
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Eastern Architectural Systems runs at 130% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Screening, window, plastics, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade D.

Eastern Architectural Systems: 4.3 TCR = 130% of Screening, window, plastics, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Eastern Architectural Systems safety composite

Eastern Architectural Systems scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 32%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

39/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 4.28 per 100 workers

Safer than 39% of industry peers

DART rate
F 3.08 per 100 workers

Safer than 32% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Eastern Architectural Systems: 3.6 → 4.3 TCR

Peak year 2019 @ 5.9 TCR · DART/TCR 0.72× in 2024

Eastern Architectural Systems's TCR rose 0.7 from 3.6 in 2017 to 4.3 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2019 at 5.9 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.72× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 326199 · Fort Myers, FL ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 4.3 · 130% of ind

  • DART 3.1 DART
  • RANK #35/63
  • PHOTO Custom Packaging Co.…
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 41 inj
  • SIZE ~170 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Custom Packaging Co., Inc. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Florida employers → · Look up another →

Eastern Architectural Systems in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Eastern Architectural Systems averages 4.3 TCR (130% of the Screening, window, plastics, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Eastern Architectural Systems TCR series: 2017=3.6 · 2019=5.9 · 2020=4.4 · 2021=3.5 · 2022=3.9 · 2024=4.3 · BLS 3.3

Where Eastern Architectural Systems falls in its industry

2,838 Screening, window, plastics, m establishments

Safer than 39% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Florida alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #35 safest of 63 Screening, window, plastics, m employers in Florida.

Eastern Architectural Systems (170 employees, TCR 4.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 101 employees and a TCR of 3.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Eastern Architectural Systems
Eastern Architectural Systems (170 employees, TCR 4.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 101 employees and a TCR of 3.5

Eastern Architectural Systems has more employees than the Screening, window, plastics, manufacturi median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 4.3 3.1 7 0 0
2022 3.9 3.9 8 0 0
2021 3.5 3.5 6 0 0
2020 4.4 3.7 6 0 0
2019 5.9 5.9 7 0 0
2017 3.6 2.6 7 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

326199 · FL · Fort Myers

2,838 Screening, window, plastics, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 26,569 rated employers in Florida with headcount on file · 484 employers in Fort Myers, FL · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Custom Packaging Co., Inc. 4.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR NYX-Linden 4.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Molded Fiber Glass 4.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR DK Manufacturing, Inc. - Frazeysburg 4.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE Emerald Coast Growers LLC 170 FTE
STATE-SIZE Jacobs - The Villages - OMI 170 FTE
STATE-SIZE B&I Contractors - Tampa Office 170 FTE
STATE-SIZE HJ Foundation 170 FTE
CITY-NEAR CCI-DANIELS LLC 2,935 FTE
CITY-NEAR Home Health Ft Myers 2,476 FTE
CITY-NEAR Shell Point Retirement Communty 1,071 FTE
CITY-NEAR Christian & Missionary Alliance Foundation, inc. 1,014 FTE
NAT-TCR Mark VII Equipment 4.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Claiborne Electric Cooperative, Inc 4.3 TCR
NAT-TCR On Time Trucking, Inc. 4.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Hajoca 528 4.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE Embree Construction 170 FTE
NAT-SIZE Plant 10 170 FTE
NAT-SIZE Oliver Rubber Company 170 FTE
NAT-SIZE BEF Foods, INC. - Sulphur Springs 170 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.