Beef carcasses, half carcasses, primal and sub-primal cuts, produced in slaughtering plants · California

Olson Meat

Orland, CA · ~67 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
18.9
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Olson Meat runs at 572% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Beef carcasses, half carcasses, primal and sub-primal cuts, produced in slaughtering plants workplace, earning a grade F.

Olson Meat: 18.9 TCR = 572% of Beef carcasses, half carcasses, primal and sub-primal cuts, produced in slaughtering plants BLS 3.3 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Olson Meat safety composite

Olson Meat scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 55% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 4%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

20/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 18.87 per 100 workers

Safer than 4% of industry peers

DART rate
F 7.3 per 100 workers

Safer than 13% of industry peers

Fatalities
C 0

Safer than 55% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−0.9

2017→2024

Olson Meat injury rate improved

Olson Meat's TCR fell 0.9 from 13.7 in 2017 to 12.8 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2018 at 38.2 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.39× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=13.7 · 2018=38.2 · 2019=13.0 · 2020=28.1 · 2021=9.9 · 2022=23.6 · 2023=11.6 · 2024=12.8

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 311611 · Orland, CA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 18.9 · 572% of ind

  • DART 7.3 DART
  • RANK #13/14
  • PHOTO Ohio Farms Packing C…
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 77 inj
  • SIZE ~67 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Ohio Farms Packing Company (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Olson Meat in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Olson Meat averages 18.9 TCR (572% of the Beef carcasses, half carcasses, primal and sub-primal cuts, produced in slaughtering plants BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Olson Meat TCR series: 2017=13.7 · 2018=38.2 · 2019=13 · 2020=28.1 · 2021=9.9 · 2022=23.6 · 2023=11.6 · 2024=12.8 · BLS 3.3

Where Olson Meat falls in its industry

212 Beef carcasses, half carcasses establishments

Safer than 4% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #13 safest of 14 Beef carcasses, half carcasses employers in California.

Olson Meat (67 employees, TCR 18.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 297 employees and a TCR of 5.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,000 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Olson Meat
Olson Meat (67 employees, TCR 18.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 297 employees and a TCR of 5.3

Olson Meat has fewer employees than the Beef carcasses, half carcasses, primal a median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 12.8 7.3 6 1 0
2023 11.6 2.3 2 3 0
2022 23.6 15.0 9 2 0
2021 9.9 8.3 5 1 0
2020 28.1 24.8 10 7 0
2019 13.0 11.9 12 0 0
2018 38.2 32.4 24 2 0
2017 13.7 7.6 9 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

311611 · CA · Orland

212 Beef carcasses, half carcasses, primal and sub-primal cuts, produced in slaughtering plants employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 24 employers in Orland, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Ohio Farms Packing Company 18.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR 7263 - 2-MAIN 19.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR 4829-13820 20.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Manning Beef, LLC 20.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE Sonoma GVIC Ranches 67 FTE
STATE-SIZE MUGU RANCH PARTNERSHIP 67 FTE
STATE-SIZE Travaille and Phippen, Inc. 67 FTE
STATE-SIZE Nurseries 67 FTE
CITY-NEAR JC Farm Services, Inc. 265 FTE
CITY-NEAR Amazon.com Services LLC - WTH1 163 FTE
CITY-NEAR Capay Farms 142 FTE
CITY-NEAR Olivarez Honey Bees 114 FTE
NAT-TCR Berlon Industries, LLC 18.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Trader Joe's 0674 Royal Oak 18.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Trader Joe's 0167 Albuquerque 18.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Green Ridge Village 18.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE Noroton Heights Fire Department 67 FTE
NAT-SIZE Westbrook Fire Department 67 FTE
NAT-SIZE Wehmeier Drywall & Painting, Inc. 67 FTE
NAT-SIZE White River Lodge 67 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.