Butterfly valves, industrial-type, manufacturing · Pennsylvania

Olson Technologies

Allentown, PA · ~33 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
13.9
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Olson Technologies runs at 421% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Butterfly valves, industrial-type, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade F.

Olson Technologies: 13.9 TCR = 421% of Butterfly valves, industrial-type, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Olson Technologies safety composite

Olson Technologies scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 78% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 0%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

40/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 13.88 per 100 workers

Safer than 0% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 78% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−10.1

2017→2024

Olson Technologies injury rate improved

Olson Technologies's TCR fell 10.1 from 13.3 in 2017 to 3.1 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2021 at 26.7 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=13.3 · 2018=3.4 · 2019=23.9 · 2020=10.8 · 2021=26.7 · 2022=19.8 · 2023=10.1 · 2024=3.1

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 332911 · Allentown, PA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 13.9 · 421% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #15/15
  • PHOTO Velan Valve
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 29 inj
  • SIZE ~33 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Velan Valve (2.4 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Pennsylvania employers → · Look up another →

Olson Technologies in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Olson Technologies averages 13.9 TCR (421% of the Butterfly valves, industrial-type, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Olson Technologies TCR series: 2017=13.3 · 2018=3.4 · 2019=23.9 · 2020=10.8 · 2021=26.7 · 2022=19.8 · 2023=10.1 · 2024=3.1 · BLS 3.3

Where Olson Technologies falls in its industry

298 Butterfly valves, industrial-t establishments

Safer than 0% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Pennsylvania alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #15 safest of 15 Butterfly valves, industrial-t employers in Pennsylvania.

Olson Technologies (33 employees, TCR 13.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 92 employees and a TCR of 2.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Olson Technologies
Olson Technologies (33 employees, TCR 13.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 92 employees and a TCR of 2.0

Olson Technologies has fewer employees than the Butterfly valves, industrial-type, manuf median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 3.1 0.0 1 0 0
2023 10.1 6.7 3 0 0
2022 19.8 7.9 5 0 0
2021 26.7 13.4 8 0 0
2020 10.8 7.2 3 0 0
2019 23.9 17.9 4 0 0
2018 3.4 3.4 1 0 0
2017 13.3 9.9 4 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

332911 · PA · Allentown

298 Butterfly valves, industrial-type, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,692 rated employers in Pennsylvania with headcount on file · 447 employers in Allentown, PA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Velan Valve 11.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR American Cap Company 10.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR SPECIALTY PRECISION MACHINING 10.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Clow Valve div of McWane 9.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE Caputo & Guest 33 FTE
STATE-SIZE Colver Power Project 33 FTE
STATE-SIZE Oil City 33 FTE
STATE-SIZE Norristown Operations 33 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lehigh Valley Hospital 9,463 FTE
CITY-NEAR 1200SCC 6,531 FTE
CITY-NEAR Air Products and Chemicals Inc.- Main Campus 2,118 FTE
CITY-NEAR LOCATION 48042 1,728 FTE
NAT-TCR Amazon.com Services LLC - XCV5 13.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Hampton Inn & Suites Berkshires Lenox 13.9 TCR
NAT-TCR A-Team Delivers LLC 13.9 TCR
NAT-TCR NA-US-TX-Austin-2301 Scarbrough Dr 13.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE Martinsburg Store & Resource Center 33 FTE
NAT-SIZE Uncasville Ct 33 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sagamore Ma 33 FTE
NAT-SIZE Mississippi State Hospital Whitfield 33 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.