Railroad rolling stock manufacturing · Nebraska

Omaha NE Signaling

Omaha, NE · ~40 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
0.0
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Omaha NE Signaling runs at 0% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Railroad rolling stock manufacturing workplace, earning a grade C.

Omaha NE Signaling: 0.0 TCR = 0% of Railroad rolling stock manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Omaha NE Signaling safety composite

Omaha NE Signaling scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 100% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

80/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 100% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 79% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Omaha NE Signaling held a steady TCR band

Omaha NE Signaling's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2016 at 0.0 TCR.

2016=0.0 · 2017=0.0 · 2018=0.0 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 336510 · Omaha, NE AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 0.0 · 0% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #0/9
  • PHOTO Trinity Industries, …
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 0 inj
  • SIZE ~40 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Trinity Industries, Inc. Corporate (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Nebraska employers → · Look up another →

Omaha NE Signaling in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Omaha NE Signaling averages 0.0 TCR (0% of the Railroad rolling stock manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Omaha NE Signaling TCR series: 2016=0 · 2017=0 · 2018=0 · 2019=0 · 2020=0 · 2021=0 · 2022=0 · 2023=0 · 2024=0 · BLS 3.3

Where Omaha NE Signaling falls in its industry

208 Railroad rolling stock manufac establishments

Safer than 100% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Nebraska alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #0 safest of 9 Railroad rolling stock manufac employers in Nebraska.

Omaha NE Signaling (40 employees, TCR 0.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 88 employees and a TCR of 2.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,0002,500 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Omaha NE Signaling
Omaha NE Signaling (40 employees, TCR 0.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 88 employees and a TCR of 2.3

Omaha NE Signaling has fewer employees than the Railroad rolling stock manufacturing median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

336510 · NE · Omaha

208 Railroad rolling stock manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 3,594 rated employers in Nebraska with headcount on file · 1,135 employers in Omaha, NE · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Trinity Industries, Inc. Corporate 0.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR The Greenbrier Paragould 0.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR LaGrange IL HQ EMD 0.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Wabtec Global Services-Boise 0.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Frenchman Valley Produce, Inc. 40 FTE
STATE-SIZE CSS Farms, LLC Columbus, NE 40 FTE
STATE-SIZE Olson Farms 40 FTE
STATE-SIZE Cheever Construction 40 FTE
CITY-NEAR Drivers Management LLC/Over the Road Drivers 9,373 FTE
CITY-NEAR Nebraska Medicine 8,728 FTE
CITY-NEAR FUSION MEDICAL STAFFING, LLC 2,874 FTE
CITY-NEAR 61830001 METHODIST HOSPITAL 2,861 FTE
NAT-TCR One Federal Street 0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR City of Fremont - Community Support Includes Recreation and Human Services 0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Cardinal Health 7000 and 7200 0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Cedar Bay Entertainment LLC 0.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Comfort Systems USA Southeast. Mobile DIV 42 40 FTE
NAT-SIZE Performance Roofing LLC 40 FTE
NAT-SIZE Goodwill Big Bend 40 FTE
NAT-SIZE CC&F Retail, Inc (dba Coffee Cup #10) 40 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.