Baseball Teams Professional or Semiprofessional · Nebraska

Omaha Storm Chasers Omaha Storm Chasers

Papillion, NE · ~27 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
3.8
Avg TCR
3.1
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Omaha Storm Chasers Omaha Storm Chasers runs at 122% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Baseball Teams Professional or Semiprofessional workplace, earning a grade D.

Omaha Storm Chasers Omaha Storm Chasers: 3.8 TCR = 122% of Baseball Teams Professional or Semiprofessional BLS 3.1 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Omaha Storm Chasers Omaha Storm Chasers safety composite

Omaha Storm Chasers Omaha Storm Chasers scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 57% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 31%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

46/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 3.77 per 100 workers

Safer than 57% of industry peers

DART rate
F 3.76 per 100 workers

Safer than 31% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Omaha Storm Chasers Omaha Storm Chasers held a steady TCR band

Omaha Storm Chasers Omaha Storm Chasers's TCR held near 0.0 from 3.8 in 2023 to 3.8 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 3.8 TCR. In 2024, DART was 1× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2023=3.8 · 2024=3.8

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 711211 · Papillion, NE ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 3.8 · 122% of ind

  • DART 3.8 DART
  • RANK #1/4
  • PHOTO San Antonio Spurs, L…
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 2 inj
  • SIZE ~27 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: San Antonio Spurs, L.L.C. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Nebraska employers → · Look up another →

Omaha Storm Chasers Omaha Storm Chasers in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Omaha Storm Chasers Omaha Storm Chasers averages 3.8 TCR (122% of the Baseball Teams Professional or Semiprofessional BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Omaha Storm Chasers Omaha Storm Chasers TCR series: 2023=3.8 · 2024=3.8 · BLS 3.1

Where Omaha Storm Chasers Omaha Storm Chasers falls in its industry

157 Baseball Teams Professional or establishments

Safer than 57% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.1.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Nebraska alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #1 safest of 4 Baseball Teams Professional or employers in Nebraska.

Omaha Storm Chasers Omaha Storm Chasers (27 employees, TCR 3.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 206 employees and a TCR of 5.1 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,000 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Omaha Storm Chasers Omaha Storm Chasers
Omaha Storm Chasers Omaha Storm Chasers (27 employees, TCR 3.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 206 employees and a TCR of 5.1

Omaha Storm Chasers Omaha Storm Chasers has fewer employees than the Baseball Teams Professional or Semiprofe median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.1. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 3.8 3.8 1 0 0
2023 3.8 3.8 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

711211 · NE · Papillion

157 Baseball Teams Professional or Semiprofessional employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 3,594 rated employers in Nebraska with headcount on file · 60 employers in Papillion, NE · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR San Antonio Spurs, L.L.C. 3.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR ADMMN-ARENA-ADMIN MN 3.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Cavaliers Holdings LLC 4.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Giants Baseball Complex 3.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE Worley Field Services at ADM Columbus 27 FTE
STATE-SIZE 103806 - NM Misc 2019 27 FTE
STATE-SIZE Charles Sargent Irrigation Co 27 FTE
STATE-SIZE Google NBF1A DCG Civil 23148009 27 FTE
CITY-NEAR Infogroup PapS9L 523 FTE
CITY-NEAR 1671 413 FTE
CITY-NEAR Papillion - Main Store 411 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 1671 411 FTE
NAT-TCR 288 Granite City 3.8 TCR
NAT-TCR 121 Wildwood 3.8 TCR
NAT-TCR San Joaquin County Department of Child Support Services 3.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Mnegn - Eagan Mn Freight Forwarding 3.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE Gold Dust Potato Processors, Inc. 27 FTE
NAT-SIZE Residence Inn Marriott Milpitas 27 FTE
NAT-SIZE Claffey's Corporation 27 FTE
NAT-SIZE VSMPO-Tirus, US 27 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.