Process control instruments, industrial, manufacturing · New Jersey

Omega Engineering - NJ

Swedesboro, NJ · ~357 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
3.3
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Omega Engineering - NJ runs at 100% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Process control instruments, industrial, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade C.

Omega Engineering - NJ: 3.3 TCR = 100% of Process control instruments, industrial, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Omega Engineering - NJ safety composite

Omega Engineering - NJ scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 11%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

22/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 3.31 per 100 workers

Safer than 13% of industry peers

DART rate
F 3.01 per 100 workers

Safer than 11% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.2

2016→2024

Omega Engineering - NJ injury rate improved

Omega Engineering - NJ's TCR fell 1.2 from 4.3 in 2016 to 3.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2018 at 5.7 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.91× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=4.3 · 2017=5.0 · 2018=5.7 · 2019=2.3 · 2020=1.4 · 2021=2.6 · 2022=3.0 · 2023=2.5 · 2024=3.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 334513 · Swedesboro, NJ ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade C · TCR 3.3 · 100% of ind

  • DART 3.0 DART
  • RANK #9/10
  • PHOTO ARI INDUSTRIES, INC
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 80 inj
  • SIZE ~357 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: ARI INDUSTRIES, INC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · New Jersey employers → · Look up another →

Omega Engineering - NJ in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Omega Engineering - NJ averages 3.3 TCR (100% of the Process control instruments, industrial, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Omega Engineering - NJ TCR series: 2016=4.3 · 2017=5 · 2018=5.7 · 2019=2.3 · 2020=1.4 · 2021=2.6 · 2022=3 · 2023=2.5 · 2024=3 · BLS 3.3

Where Omega Engineering - NJ falls in its industry

322 Process control instruments, i establishments

Safer than 13% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to New Jersey alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #9 safest of 10 Process control instruments, i employers in New Jersey.

Omega Engineering - NJ (357 employees, TCR 3.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 96 employees and a TCR of 1.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600 02468 Average employees Total Case Rate Omega Engineering - NJ
Omega Engineering - NJ (357 employees, TCR 3.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 96 employees and a TCR of 1.3

Omega Engineering - NJ has more employees than the Process control instruments, industrial, median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 3.0 3.0 7 1 0
2023 2.5 1.8 5 2 0
2022 3.0 2.8 5 5 0
2021 2.6 2.6 7 1 0
2020 1.4 0.8 4 1 0
2019 2.3 1.7 8 0 0
2018 5.7 5.1 19 2 0
2017 5.0 3.2 13 1 0
2016 4.3 2.1 12 2 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

334513 · NJ · Swedesboro

322 Process control instruments, industrial, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 11,201 rated employers in New Jersey with headcount on file · 74 employers in Swedesboro, NJ · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR ARI INDUSTRIES, INC 3.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR OSHA 2018 3.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Dwyer Instruments Inc - Kingsbury IN 3.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR MIRATECH _ Houston 3.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE PISCATAWAY NJ 357 FTE
STATE-SIZE WM 2651 357 FTE
STATE-SIZE Howell Garage 357 FTE
STATE-SIZE Joseph M. Sanzari Inc 356 FTE
CITY-NEAR Ready Pac Foods 785 FTE
CITY-NEAR Aspire Bakeries - Swedesboro 525 FTE
CITY-NEAR NJ02 - Swedesboro Fulfillment Center 497 FTE
CITY-NEAR ARYZTA - Swedesboro 490 FTE
NAT-TCR BioMerieux - Lombard 3.3 TCR
NAT-TCR William F. Lynch Co., Inc. 3.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Delta Asphalt of Arkansas Construction 3.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Lehigh Asphalt Paving & Construction, Co., Inc. 3.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE Clay County Medical Center 357 FTE
NAT-SIZE Thermo Electron Scientific Instruments, LLC 357 FTE
NAT-SIZE Lockheed Martin Corporation Lakeland Campus (1045) 357 FTE
NAT-SIZE 1WW 357 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.