Packaging, plastics (e.g., blister, bubble), manufacturing · Michigan

Omega Plastics, Inc.

Clinton Township, MI · ~98 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
3.4
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Omega Plastics, Inc. runs at 103% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Packaging, plastics (e.g., blister, bubble), manufacturing workplace, earning a grade C.

Omega Plastics, Inc.: 3.4 TCR = 103% of Packaging, plastics (e.g., blister, bubble), manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Omega Plastics, Inc. safety composite

Omega Plastics, Inc. scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 59% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

54/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 3.4 per 100 workers

Safer than 52% of industry peers

DART rate
C 1.12 per 100 workers

Safer than 59% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.5

2017→2024

Omega Plastics, Inc. injury rate improved

Omega Plastics, Inc.'s TCR fell 1.5 from 6.0 in 2017 to 4.5 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2017 at 6.0 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.33× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=6.0 · 2020=2.1 · 2022=3.4 · 2023=1.0 · 2024=4.5

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 326199 · Clinton Township, MI ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 3.4 · 103% of ind

  • DART 1.1 DART
  • RANK #95/218
  • PHOTO Harvey Building Prod…
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 17 inj
  • SIZE ~98 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Harvey Building Products (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Michigan employers → · Look up another →

Omega Plastics, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Omega Plastics, Inc. averages 3.4 TCR (103% of the Packaging, plastics (e.g., blister, bubble), manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Omega Plastics, Inc. TCR series: 2017=6 · 2020=2.1 · 2022=3.4 · 2023=1 · 2024=4.5 · BLS 3.3

Where Omega Plastics, Inc. falls in its industry

2,838 Packaging, plastics (e.g., bli establishments

Safer than 52% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Michigan alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #95 safest of 218 Packaging, plastics (e.g., bli employers in Michigan.

Omega Plastics, Inc. (98 employees, TCR 3.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 101 employees and a TCR of 3.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Omega Plastics, Inc.
Omega Plastics, Inc. (98 employees, TCR 3.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 101 employees and a TCR of 3.5

Omega Plastics, Inc. has fewer employees than the Packaging, plastics (e.g., blister, bubb median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 4.5 1.1 4 0 0
2023 1.0 0.0 1 0 0
2022 3.4 2.3 3 0 0
2020 2.1 1.1 2 0 0
2017 6.0 0.8 7 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

326199 · MI · Clinton Township

2,838 Packaging, plastics (e.g., blister, bubble), manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,393 rated employers in Michigan with headcount on file · 91 employers in Clinton Township, MI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Harvey Building Products 3.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Versacourt 3.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Sealed Air Corporation 3.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Irwin 3.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE Lansing Office 98 FTE
STATE-SIZE 4039-03822500-00W001 98 FTE
STATE-SIZE D&W MECHANICAL 98 FTE
STATE-SIZE Ann Arbor Ceiling & Partition, LLC 98 FTE
CITY-NEAR Henry Ford Macomb 3,221 FTE
CITY-NEAR Henry Ford Macomb Hospital 3,007 FTE
CITY-NEAR Monster Energy Company Michigan 2,015 FTE
CITY-NEAR McLaren Macomb Hospital 1,851 FTE
NAT-TCR Caprock Home Health Services, Inc WF 3.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Navasota Valley Electric Cooperative Inc.- Franklin 3.4 TCR
NAT-TCR St. Pierre Mfg. Corp. 3.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Field and Technical Services 3.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE Farmington Station Assisted Living Residence 98 FTE
NAT-SIZE Orwigsburg Center Rehabilitation and Nursing Center LLC 98 FTE
NAT-SIZE Enteprise Rent-A-Car 03RN 98 FTE
NAT-SIZE Hillcrest Firethorn, LLC 98 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2020, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.