Jigs and fixtures for use with machine tools manufacturing · Michigan

Omni Die & Engineering Inc.

Holland, MI · ~36 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
3.4
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Omni Die & Engineering Inc. runs at 102% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Jigs and fixtures for use with machine tools manufacturing workplace, earning a grade C.

Omni Die & Engineering Inc.: 3.4 TCR = 102% of Jigs and fixtures for use with machine tools manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Omni Die & Engineering Inc. safety composite

Omni Die & Engineering Inc. scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 5%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

35/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 3.35 per 100 workers

Safer than 51% of industry peers

DART rate
F 7.12 per 100 workers

Safer than 5% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Omni Die & Engineering Inc.: 0.0 → 10.7 TCR

Peak year 2024 @ 10.7 TCR · DART/TCR 2.13× in 2024

Omni Die & Engineering Inc.'s TCR rose 10.7 from 0.0 in 2016 to 10.7 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 2.13× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 333514 · Holland, MI ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 3.4 · 102% of ind

  • DART 7.1 DART
  • RANK #60/131
  • PHOTO MID-SOUTH/CENTRAL EX…
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 10 inj
  • SIZE ~36 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: MID-SOUTH/CENTRAL EXTRUSION (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Michigan employers → · Look up another →

Omni Die & Engineering Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Omni Die & Engineering Inc. averages 3.4 TCR (102% of the Jigs and fixtures for use with machine tools manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Omni Die & Engineering Inc. TCR series: 2016=0 · 2017=3 · 2018=10 · 2019=0 · 2020=0 · 2021=0 · 2022=3.3 · 2023=3.1 · 2024=10.7 · BLS 3.3

Where Omni Die & Engineering Inc. falls in its industry

387 Jigs and fixtures for use with establishments

Safer than 51% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.4.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Michigan alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #60 safest of 131 Jigs and fixtures for use with employers in Michigan.

Omni Die & Engineering Inc. (36 employees, TCR 3.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 3.4 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Omni Die & Engineering Inc.
Omni Die & Engineering Inc. (36 employees, TCR 3.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 3.4

Omni Die & Engineering Inc. has fewer employees than the Jigs and fixtures for use with machine t median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.4. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 10.7 7.1 3 0 0
2023 3.1 3.1 1 0 0
2022 3.3 3.3 1 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 10.0 0.0 4 0 0
2017 3.0 3.0 1 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

333514 · MI · Holland

387 Jigs and fixtures for use with machine tools manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,393 rated employers in Michigan with headcount on file · 299 employers in Holland, MI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR MID-SOUTH/CENTRAL EXTRUSION 3.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR EBI MANUFACTURING LLC 3.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Wisconsin Metal Parts, Inc. 3.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Huron Tool & Engineering 3.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE R & R ASPHALT INC 36 FTE
STATE-SIZE Blue Water Energy Center 36 FTE
STATE-SIZE Facilities 36 FTE
STATE-SIZE Grand Haven Office 36 FTE
CITY-NEAR LG Energy Solutions - Holland 1,263 FTE
CITY-NEAR Haworth HQ 1,165 FTE
CITY-NEAR Haworth Office 1,075 FTE
CITY-NEAR PADNOS 912 FTE
NAT-TCR Cavanaugh Electrical Contracting Inc. 3.4 TCR
NAT-TCR 044-LOW 3.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Kentucky QCC 3.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Van Doren Oil Company 3.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE 025-PEO 36 FTE
NAT-SIZE Feed Mill 36 FTE
NAT-SIZE Desert Hills Premium Outlets 36 FTE
NAT-SIZE Main Offices 36 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.