Control circuit relays, industrial, manufacturing · California

Omron Adept Technology (OAT-CA)

San Ramon, CA · ~143 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.8
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Omron Adept Technology (OAT-CA) runs at 24% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Control circuit relays, industrial, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade A.

Omron Adept Technology (OAT-CA): 0.8 TCR = 24% of Control circuit relays, industrial, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Omron Adept Technology (OAT-CA) safety composite

Omron Adept Technology (OAT-CA) scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 77% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

69/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 0.8 per 100 workers

Safer than 73% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 77% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.7

2017→2019

Omron Adept Technology (OAT-CA) injury rate improved

Omron Adept Technology (OAT-CA)'s TCR fell 1.7 from 1.7 in 2017 to 0.0 in 2019. Peak filing year was 2017 at 1.7 TCR. In 2019, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=1.7 · 2018=0.7 · 2019=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 335314 · San Ramon, CA AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 0.8 · 24% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #4/9
  • PHOTO Carlyle Johnson Mach…
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 3 inj
  • SIZE ~143 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Carlyle Johnson Machine Co LLC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Omron Adept Technology (OAT-CA) in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Omron Adept Technology (OAT-CA) averages 0.8 TCR (24% of the Control circuit relays, industrial, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Omron Adept Technology (OAT-CA) TCR series: 2017=1.7 · 2018=0.7 · 2019=0 · BLS 3.3

Where Omron Adept Technology (OAT-CA) falls in its industry

156 Control circuit relays, indust establishments

Safer than 73% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #4 safest of 9 Control circuit relays, indust employers in California.

Omron Adept Technology (OAT-CA) (143 employees, TCR 0.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 99 employees and a TCR of 1.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Omron Adept Technology (OAT-CA)
Omron Adept Technology (OAT-CA) (143 employees, TCR 0.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 99 employees and a TCR of 1.3

Omron Adept Technology (OAT-CA) has more employees than the Control circuit relays, industrial, manu median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 0.7 0.7 1 0 0
2017 1.7 1.7 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

335314 · CA · San Ramon

156 Control circuit relays, industrial, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 98 employers in San Ramon, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Carlyle Johnson Machine Co LLC 0.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Rockwell Automation- Middleton WI (MDN) 0.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR YA1 AER - HAUPPAUGE 0.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Rockwell Automation- Houston TX-S+S (SCH) 0.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE John Kautz Farms 143 FTE
STATE-SIZE Deseret Farms of California 143 FTE
STATE-SIZE Southland Sod Farms Operations, Inc. 143 FTE
STATE-SIZE DuPont Pioneer Woodland WDL1 143 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of TransportationFacility 200 2,891 FTE
CITY-NEAR Robert Half - CA San Ramon Corp 90000 1,793 FTE
CITY-NEAR SNRMCA57 1,466 FTE
CITY-NEAR SNRMCA57 - AT&T Services, Inc. 1,269 FTE
NAT-TCR Covanta Fairfax, Inc. 0.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Hayes Industries 0.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Canton, OH 0.8 TCR
NAT-TCR CCI- Hayesville Plant 0.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE Dayton Plant 143 FTE
NAT-SIZE Daviess County-Dcbs 143 FTE
NAT-SIZE Advanced Disposal - Orlando Hauling 143 FTE
NAT-SIZE Excelitas Technologies - Miamisburg, Ohio 143 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.