Non-destructive testing laboratories or services · South Carolina

On-Shore Wind - NAM - Greenville Engineering

Greenville, SC · ~197 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
0.5
Avg TCR
0.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

On-Shore Wind - NAM - Greenville Engineering runs at 102% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Non-destructive testing laboratories or services workplace, earning a grade C.

On-Shore Wind - NAM - Greenville Engineering: 0.5 TCR = 102% of Non-destructive testing laboratories or services BLS 0.5 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

On-Shore Wind - NAM - Greenville Engineering safety composite

On-Shore Wind - NAM - Greenville Engineering scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 72% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

66/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 0.51 per 100 workers

Safer than 72% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 71% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.0

2022→2024

On-Shore Wind - NAM - Greenville Engineering injury rate improved

On-Shore Wind - NAM - Greenville Engineering's TCR fell 1.0 from 1.0 in 2022 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 1.0 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2022=1.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 541380 · Greenville, SC ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade C · TCR 0.5 · 102% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK P72
  • PHOTO Terracon Consultants…
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 1 inj
  • SIZE ~197 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Terracon Consultants Inc (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · South Carolina employers → · Look up another →

On-Shore Wind - NAM - Greenville Engineering in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows On-Shore Wind - NAM - Greenville Engineering averages 0.5 TCR (102% of the Non-destructive testing laboratories or services BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

On-Shore Wind - NAM - Greenville Engineering TCR series: 2022=1 · 2024=0 · BLS 0.5

Where On-Shore Wind - NAM - Greenville Engineering falls in its industry

232 Non-destructive testing labora establishments

Safer than 72% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers
On-Shore Wind - NAM - Greenville Engineering (197 employees, TCR 0.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 81 employees and a TCR of 1.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,0005,000 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate On-Shore Wind - NAM - Greenville Engineering
On-Shore Wind - NAM - Greenville Engineering (197 employees, TCR 0.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 81 employees and a TCR of 1.0

On-Shore Wind - NAM - Greenville Engineering has more employees than the Non-destructive testing laboratories or median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 1.0 0.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

541380 · SC · Greenville

232 Non-destructive testing laboratories or services employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,610 rated employers in South Carolina with headcount on file · 573 employers in Greenville, SC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Terracon Consultants Inc 0.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Dugway Proving Ground 0.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Inalfa Roof Systems Technical Center 0.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Nitto Avecia Pharma Services 0.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE Barry Wehmiller Flexible Systems 197 FTE
STATE-SIZE Avnet Gaffney US34S 197 FTE
STATE-SIZE Breakthru Beverage South Carolina - Ridgeway 197 FTE
STATE-SIZE NHC Healthcare North Augusta 197 FTE
CITY-NEAR GREENVILLE MEMORIAL MED CAMPUS 6,132 FTE
CITY-NEAR St Francis Health System 3,395 FTE
CITY-NEAR Gas Power Systems : Greenville, SC, USA 2,971 FTE
CITY-NEAR GSC : Greenville, SC, USA 2,673 FTE
NAT-TCR Harrison Waiver 0.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Ridley Feed Ingredients 0.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Hood Container York 0.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Applegate Teeples Drilling Co. Inc 0.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE The Resident Home dba Envision 197 FTE
NAT-SIZE The H.T. Hackney 197 FTE
NAT-SIZE Kwangjin America, Inc. 197 FTE
NAT-SIZE PHMG Peace Harbor Clinics 197 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.