Alternative energy (e.g., geothermal, ocean wave, solar, wind) structure construction · New York

On-Shore Wind - NAM - Projects

Schenectady, NY · ~65 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.2
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

On-Shore Wind - NAM - Projects runs at 6% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Alternative energy (e.g., geothermal, ocean wave, solar, wind) structure construction workplace, earning a grade A.

On-Shore Wind - NAM - Projects: 0.2 TCR = 6% of Alternative energy (e.g., geothermal, ocean wave, solar, wind) structure construction BLS 2.8 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

On-Shore Wind - NAM - Projects safety composite

On-Shore Wind - NAM - Projects scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 98% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 52%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

80/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0.17 per 100 workers

Safer than 98% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 78% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−0.5

2022→2024

On-Shore Wind - NAM - Projects injury rate improved

On-Shore Wind - NAM - Projects's TCR fell 0.5 from 0.5 in 2022 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 0.5 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2022=0.5 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 237130 · Schenectady, NY AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 0.2 · 6% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #3/44
  • PHOTO Sky Climber Renewables
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 1 inj
  • SIZE ~65 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Sky Climber Renewables (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · New York employers → · Look up another →

On-Shore Wind - NAM - Projects in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows On-Shore Wind - NAM - Projects averages 0.2 TCR (6% of the Alternative energy (e.g., geothermal, ocean wave, solar, wind) structure construction BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

On-Shore Wind - NAM - Projects TCR series: 2022=0.5 · 2023=0 · 2024=0 · BLS 2.8

Where On-Shore Wind - NAM - Projects falls in its industry

1,605 Alternative energy (e.g., geot establishments

Safer than 98% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to New York alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #3 safest of 44 Alternative energy (e.g., geot employers in New York.

On-Shore Wind - NAM - Projects (65 employees, TCR 0.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 74 employees and a TCR of 2.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate On-Shore Wind - NAM - Projects
On-Shore Wind - NAM - Projects (65 employees, TCR 0.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 74 employees and a TCR of 2.0

On-Shore Wind - NAM - Projects has fewer employees than the Alternative energy (e.g., geothermal, oc median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.5 0.5 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

237130 · NY · Schenectady

1,605 Alternative energy (e.g., geothermal, ocean wave, solar, wind) structure construction employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 21,008 rated employers in New York with headcount on file · 154 employers in Schenectady, NY · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Sky Climber Renewables 0.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Kaltz Excavating 0.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Raymondville 0.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Byers Engineering Company 0.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE Pearl Creek Management, Inc. 65 FTE
STATE-SIZE John B Martin & Sons Farms, Inc 65 FTE
STATE-SIZE Merrell Dairy, LLC 65 FTE
STATE-SIZE NYSEG Hornell 65 FTE
CITY-NEAR Gas Power Systems : Schenectady, NY, USA 4,057 FTE
CITY-NEAR GSC : Schenectady, NY, USA 3,397 FTE
CITY-NEAR Ellis Hospital 3,061 FTE
CITY-NEAR Union College 1,827 FTE
NAT-TCR IPS - Integrated Project Services, LLC - Somerset 0.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Aleut Aerospace Engineering, LLC - Summary 0.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Performance Contractors, Inc. - REG-Geismar 0.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Thales Avionics INC CA 0.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE INEOS Calabrian 65 FTE
NAT-SIZE Virginia Mirror LLC 65 FTE
NAT-SIZE ASPEN TECHNOLOGIES INC - Michigan 65 FTE
NAT-SIZE Glacier Construction CO INC. 65 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.