Foam polystyrene products manufacturing · Michigan

ASPEN TECHNOLOGIES INC - Michigan

Brighton, Mi, MI · ~65 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
9.9
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

ASPEN TECHNOLOGIES INC - Michigan runs at 300% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Foam polystyrene products manufacturing workplace, earning a grade F.

ASPEN TECHNOLOGIES INC - Michigan: 9.9 TCR = 300% of Foam polystyrene products manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

ASPEN TECHNOLOGIES INC - Michigan safety composite

ASPEN TECHNOLOGIES INC - Michigan scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 6%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

33/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 9.89 per 100 workers

Safer than 6% of industry peers

DART rate
D 1.52 per 100 workers

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

ASPEN TECHNOLOGIES INC - Michigan: 3.2 → 4.6 TCR

Peak year 2023 @ 21.9 TCR · DART/TCR 0.15× in 2024

ASPEN TECHNOLOGIES INC - Michigan's TCR rose 1.3 from 3.2 in 2022 to 4.6 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 21.9 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.15× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 326140 · Brighton, Mi, MI ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 9.9 · 300% of ind

  • DART 1.5 DART
  • RANK #12/14
  • PHOTO Manufacturing Plant
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 18 inj
  • SIZE ~65 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Manufacturing Plant (0.1 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Michigan employers → · Look up another →

ASPEN TECHNOLOGIES INC - Michigan in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows ASPEN TECHNOLOGIES INC - Michigan averages 9.9 TCR (300% of the Foam polystyrene products manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

ASPEN TECHNOLOGIES INC - Michigan TCR series: 2022=3.2 · 2023=21.9 · 2024=4.6 · BLS 3.3

Where ASPEN TECHNOLOGIES INC - Michigan falls in its industry

260 Foam polystyrene products manu establishments

Safer than 6% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.1.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Michigan alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #12 safest of 14 Foam polystyrene products manu employers in Michigan.

ASPEN TECHNOLOGIES INC - Michigan (65 employees, TCR 9.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 3.1 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate ASPEN TECHNOLOGIES INC - Michigan
ASPEN TECHNOLOGIES INC - Michigan (65 employees, TCR 9.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 3.1

ASPEN TECHNOLOGIES INC - Michigan has fewer employees than the Foam polystyrene products manufacturing median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.1. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 4.6 1.5 3 0 0
2023 21.9 3.4 13 0 0
2022 3.2 0.0 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

326140 · MI · Brighton, Mi

260 Foam polystyrene products manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,393 rated employers in Michigan with headcount on file · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Manufacturing Plant 10.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Drew Foam Companies, Inc. of Tennessee 10.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR LaSalle Bristol IN 3702 9.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Cellox, LLC 9.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE Ridgeview Orchards 65 FTE
STATE-SIZE PG Manufacturing 65 FTE
STATE-SIZE Marquette Board of Light and Power 65 FTE
STATE-SIZE SunGlo 65 FTE
NAT-TCR King Kullen#17 9.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Ray Hickey Hospice House 9.9 TCR
NAT-TCR PCC Community Markets - Bellevue 9.9 TCR
NAT-TCR The Joule Dallas 9.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE Glacier Construction CO INC. 65 FTE
NAT-SIZE On-Shore Wind - NAM - Projects 65 FTE
NAT-SIZE King Kullen #19 65 FTE
NAT-SIZE Quicksilver Express Courier of Missouri Inc 65 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.