Electric power generation, fossil fuel (e.g., coal, oil, gas) · Oklahoma

Oneta Power, LLC

Broken Arrow, OK · ~28 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.4
Avg TCR
1.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Oneta Power, LLC runs at 33% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Electric power generation, fossil fuel (e.g., coal, oil, gas) workplace, earning a grade A.

Oneta Power, LLC: 0.4 TCR = 33% of Electric power generation, fossil fuel (e.g., coal, oil, gas) BLS 1.2 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Oneta Power, LLC safety composite

Oneta Power, LLC scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 93% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

75/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0.39 per 100 workers

Safer than 93% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 71% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Oneta Power, LLC held a steady TCR band

Oneta Power, LLC's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 3.5 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=0.0 · 2017=0.0 · 2018=0.0 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=3.5 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 221112 · Broken Arrow, OK AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 0.4 · 33% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #2/33
  • PHOTO Doswell Energy Center
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 1 inj
  • SIZE ~28 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Doswell Energy Center (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Oklahoma employers → · Look up another →

Oneta Power, LLC in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Oneta Power, LLC averages 0.4 TCR (33% of the Electric power generation, fossil fuel (e.g., coal, oil, gas) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Oneta Power, LLC TCR series: 2016=0 · 2017=0 · 2018=0 · 2019=0 · 2020=0 · 2021=0 · 2022=0 · 2023=3.5 · 2024=0 · BLS 1.2

Where Oneta Power, LLC falls in its industry

846 Electric power generation, fos establishments

Safer than 93% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Oklahoma alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #2 safest of 33 Electric power generation, fos employers in Oklahoma.

Oneta Power, LLC (28 employees, TCR 0.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 59 employees and a TCR of 1.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Oneta Power, LLC
Oneta Power, LLC (28 employees, TCR 0.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 59 employees and a TCR of 1.5

Oneta Power, LLC has fewer employees than the Electric power generation, fossil fuel ( median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 3.5 3.5 1 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

221112 · OK · Broken Arrow

846 Electric power generation, fossil fuel (e.g., coal, oil, gas) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 5,320 rated employers in Oklahoma with headcount on file · 136 employers in Broken Arrow, OK · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Doswell Energy Center 0.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Allen Steam Station 0.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Tenaska Frontier Generating Station 0.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR PWC West County Energy Center 0.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE Farmers Coop Mill & Elevator Association Gin 28 FTE
STATE-SIZE L Wallace Construction 28 FTE
STATE-SIZE Hudson Trenching Service, Inc. 28 FTE
STATE-SIZE Tower Inspection, Inc. 28 FTE
CITY-NEAR Simulation 662 FTE
CITY-NEAR 1160 - Simulation Systems 551 FTE
CITY-NEAR Zeeco HQ 525 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 472 415 FTE
NAT-TCR Saab Inc. Aeronautics Indiana 0.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Automated Logic Controls (New York-New Jersey) 0.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Quietflex Manufacturing Company, L.P.- Pittston PA 0.4 TCR
NAT-TCR JandJ Los Gatos 0.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE Innovative Handling 28 FTE
NAT-SIZE Wargo Interior Systems Inc 28 FTE
NAT-SIZE Bear IC, LLC 28 FTE
NAT-SIZE Environmental Control Solutions, Inc 28 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.