Electric power generation, fossil fuel (e.g., coal, oil, gas) · Texas

Tenaska Frontier Generating Station

Shiro, TX · ~28 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.4
Avg TCR
1.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Tenaska Frontier Generating Station runs at 32% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Electric power generation, fossil fuel (e.g., coal, oil, gas) workplace, earning a grade A.

Tenaska Frontier Generating Station: 0.4 TCR = 32% of Electric power generation, fossil fuel (e.g., coal, oil, gas) BLS 1.2 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Tenaska Frontier Generating Station safety composite

Tenaska Frontier Generating Station scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 93% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

75/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0.38 per 100 workers

Safer than 93% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 71% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Tenaska Frontier Generating Station held a steady TCR band

Tenaska Frontier Generating Station's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2019 at 3.4 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=0.0 · 2017=0.0 · 2018=0.0 · 2019=3.4 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 221112 · Shiro, TX AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 0.4 · 32% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #6/86
  • PHOTO PWC West County Ener…
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 1 inj
  • SIZE ~28 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: PWC West County Energy Center (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

Tenaska Frontier Generating Station in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Tenaska Frontier Generating Station averages 0.4 TCR (32% of the Electric power generation, fossil fuel (e.g., coal, oil, gas) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Tenaska Frontier Generating Station TCR series: 2016=0 · 2017=0 · 2018=0 · 2019=3.4 · 2020=0 · 2021=0 · 2022=0 · 2023=0 · 2024=0 · BLS 1.2

Where Tenaska Frontier Generating Station falls in its industry

846 Electric power generation, fos establishments

Safer than 93% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #6 safest of 86 Electric power generation, fos employers in Texas.

Tenaska Frontier Generating Station (28 employees, TCR 0.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 59 employees and a TCR of 1.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Tenaska Frontier Generating Station
Tenaska Frontier Generating Station (28 employees, TCR 0.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 59 employees and a TCR of 1.5

Tenaska Frontier Generating Station has fewer employees than the Electric power generation, fossil fuel ( median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 3.4 0.0 1 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

221112 · TX · Shiro

846 Electric power generation, fossil fuel (e.g., coal, oil, gas) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR PWC West County Energy Center 0.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Lark Maintenance Facility 0.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Oneta Power, LLC 0.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Ybor Data Center 0.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE Village farms of Fort Worth 28 FTE
STATE-SIZE Circle X Land & Cattle Co., Ltd. 28 FTE
STATE-SIZE Happy Hen Harwood 28 FTE
STATE-SIZE Ten Hi Gin INC 28 FTE
NAT-TCR Southern WV Paving 0.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Illinois Tool Works Electronic Assembly Equipment - Camdenton, MO 65020 0.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Empire District Corporate Office 0.4 TCR
NAT-TCR The Chemours Company FC, LLC - Belle 0.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE Rayco Roof Service, Inc. 28 FTE
NAT-SIZE R+L Carriers - TCS 28 FTE
NAT-SIZE Fire 28 FTE
NAT-SIZE Ward Trucking LLC-Winchester 28 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.