Courier services (i.e., intercity network) (except establishments operating under a universal service obligation) · Texas

OnPoint Delivery LLC.

Frisco, TX · ~122 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
8.8
Avg TCR
6.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

OnPoint Delivery LLC. runs at 136% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Courier services (i.e., intercity network) (except establishments operating under a universal service obligation) workplace, earning a grade D.

OnPoint Delivery LLC.: 8.8 TCR = 136% of Courier services (i.e., intercity network) (except establishments operating under a universal service obligation) BLS 6.5 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

OnPoint Delivery LLC. safety composite

OnPoint Delivery LLC. scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 15%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

36/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 8.81 per 100 workers

Safer than 44% of industry peers

DART rate
F 13.03 per 100 workers

Safer than 15% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

OnPoint Delivery LLC.: 4.6 → 13.0 TCR

Peak year 2024 @ 13.0 TCR · DART/TCR 1.48× in 2024

OnPoint Delivery LLC.'s TCR rose 8.4 from 4.6 in 2019 to 13.0 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 1.48× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 492110 · Frisco, TX ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 8.8 · 136% of ind

  • DART 13.0 DART
  • RANK #258/463
  • PHOTO Amazon.com Services …
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 15 inj
  • SIZE ~122 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Amazon.com Services LLC - DCL4 (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

OnPoint Delivery LLC. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows OnPoint Delivery LLC. averages 8.8 TCR (136% of the Courier services (i.e., intercity network) (except establishments operating under a universal service obligation) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

OnPoint Delivery LLC. TCR series: 2019=4.6 · 2024=13 · BLS 6.5

Where OnPoint Delivery LLC. falls in its industry

6,679 Courier services (i.e., interc establishments

Safer than 44% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 8.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #258 safest of 463 Courier services (i.e., interc employers in Texas.

OnPoint Delivery LLC. (122 employees, TCR 8.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 113 employees and a TCR of 8.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,000 0102030 Average employees Total Case Rate OnPoint Delivery LLC.
OnPoint Delivery LLC. (122 employees, TCR 8.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 113 employees and a TCR of 8.0

OnPoint Delivery LLC. has more employees than the Courier services (i.e., intercity networ median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 8.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 13.0 13.0 13 1 0
2019 4.6 4.6 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

492110 · TX · Frisco

6,679 Courier services (i.e., intercity network) (except establishments operating under a universal service obligation) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 174 employers in Frisco, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Amazon.com Services LLC - DCL4 8.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Amazon.com Services LLC - DTG5 8.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR MNWIN - WINONA 8.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR ORGRA - GRANTS PASS 8.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE Iron Horse Tools, Inc. 122 FTE
STATE-SIZE San Benito SC 122 FTE
STATE-SIZE Lubbock Operations Center-119 122 FTE
STATE-SIZE Amarillo Technical Center-122 122 FTE
CITY-NEAR 4701-238 8,351 FTE
CITY-NEAR 4701-RRD 2,767 FTE
CITY-NEAR 4016-18236000 1,108 FTE
CITY-NEAR Sinacola 845 FTE
NAT-TCR Orange County 8.8 TCR
NAT-TCR TransPak - DIV 125 Robertsdale 8.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Kamps Pallets Deerfield Beach 8.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Sunflower Springs 8.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE Elo KOC 122 FTE
NAT-SIZE Wingspan Care Group - Shaker 122 FTE
NAT-SIZE Memorial Woodland Village Nursing Center 122 FTE
NAT-SIZE KS010 Blue Rapids Gypsum 122 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.