Boxes, corrugated and solid fiber, made from purchased paper or paperboard · California

Ontario Container

Ontario, CA · ~105 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
3.0
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Ontario Container runs at 91% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Boxes, corrugated and solid fiber, made from purchased paper or paperboard workplace, earning a grade C.

Ontario Container: 3.0 TCR = 91% of Boxes, corrugated and solid fiber, made from purchased paper or paperboard BLS 3.3 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Ontario Container safety composite

Ontario Container scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 38%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

42/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 2.99 per 100 workers

Safer than 38% of industry peers

DART rate
D 1.5 per 100 workers

Safer than 40% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.4

2017→2024

Ontario Container injury rate improved

Ontario Container's TCR fell 2.4 from 3.9 in 2017 to 1.5 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 7.9 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.5× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=3.9 · 2018=4.5 · 2019=0.9 · 2020=3.7 · 2021=0.8 · 2022=7.9 · 2023=0.7 · 2024=1.5

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 322211 · Ontario, CA AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade C · TCR 3.0 · 91% of ind

  • DART 1.5 DART
  • RANK #57/111
  • PHOTO UFP Protective Packa…
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 27 inj
  • SIZE ~105 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: UFP Protective Packaging, LLC - Titan Corrugated (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Ontario Container in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Ontario Container averages 3.0 TCR (91% of the Boxes, corrugated and solid fiber, made from purchased paper or paperboard BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Ontario Container TCR series: 2017=3.9 · 2018=4.5 · 2019=0.9 · 2020=3.7 · 2021=0.8 · 2022=7.9 · 2023=0.7 · 2024=1.5 · BLS 3.3

Where Ontario Container falls in its industry

1,338 Boxes, corrugated and solid fi establishments

Safer than 38% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.4.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #57 safest of 111 Boxes, corrugated and solid fi employers in California.

Ontario Container (105 employees, TCR 3.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 102 employees and a TCR of 2.4 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0123456 Average employees Total Case Rate Ontario Container
Ontario Container (105 employees, TCR 3.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 102 employees and a TCR of 2.4

Ontario Container has more employees than the Boxes, corrugated and solid fiber, made median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.4. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 1.5 1.5 2 0 0
2023 0.7 0.7 1 0 0
2022 7.9 7.1 9 1 0
2021 0.8 0.8 1 0 0
2020 3.7 1.8 4 0 0
2019 0.9 0.9 1 0 0
2018 4.5 4.5 5 0 0
2017 3.9 2.9 4 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

322211 · CA · Ontario

1,338 Boxes, corrugated and solid fiber, made from purchased paper or paperboard employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 599 employers in Ontario, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR UFP Protective Packaging, LLC - Titan Corrugated 3.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Alsip Minimill 3.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Aurora Sheet 3.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Pratt (Georgia Box), Inc. 3.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Villa Park Riverside 105 FTE
STATE-SIZE Zion Harvest 105 FTE
STATE-SIZE Fowler Packing Farm Management 105 FTE
STATE-SIZE SATICOY BASE - 15 105 FTE
CITY-NEAR Prime Healthcare Services Inc. Location: St. Mary's, Passaic LLC 46-3499370 (HP29) 10,997 FTE
CITY-NEAR CAONA - ONTARIO HUB 4,372 FTE
CITY-NEAR ONTARIO HUB (CAONA) 3,354 FTE
CITY-NEAR Atlantic Solutions Group Inc, Inc. DBA Empire Workforce Solutions 3,240 FTE
NAT-TCR Shelby Mfg 305 Mansfield Ave 3.0 TCR
NAT-TCR SP McCarl & Company 3.0 TCR
NAT-TCR High School 3.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Holman Logistics - GE Perryville 3.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Precision Coating 105 FTE
NAT-SIZE Brunswick, GA 543 105 FTE
NAT-SIZE Kraft Mold 105 FTE
NAT-SIZE Nashville Ballet 105 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.