Refrigeration equipment and supplies, commercial-type, merchant wholesalers · California

Ontario, United Refrigeration

Ontario, CA · ~34 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
5.2
Avg TCR
2.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Ontario, United Refrigeration runs at 237% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Refrigeration equipment and supplies, commercial-type, merchant wholesalers workplace, earning a grade F.

Ontario, United Refrigeration: 5.2 TCR = 237% of Refrigeration equipment and supplies, commercial-type, merchant wholesalers BLS 2.2 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Ontario, United Refrigeration safety composite

Ontario, United Refrigeration scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 10%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

26/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 5.21 per 100 workers

Safer than 26% of industry peers

DART rate
F 7.4 per 100 workers

Safer than 10% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Ontario, United Refrigeration: 0.0 → 7.4 TCR

Peak year 2018 @ 8.2 TCR · DART/TCR 1.42× in 2019

Ontario, United Refrigeration's TCR rose 7.4 from 0.0 in 2017 to 7.4 in 2019. Peak filing year was 2018 at 8.2 TCR. In 2019, DART was 1.42× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 423740 · Ontario, CA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 5.2 · 237% of ind

  • DART 7.4 DART
  • RANK #9/12
  • PHOTO Thermo King West Tol…
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 6 inj
  • SIZE ~34 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Thermo King West Tolleson (0.3 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Ontario, United Refrigeration in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Ontario, United Refrigeration averages 5.2 TCR (237% of the Refrigeration equipment and supplies, commercial-type, merchant wholesalers BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Ontario, United Refrigeration TCR series: 2017=0 · 2018=8.2 · 2019=7.4 · BLS 2.2

Where Ontario, United Refrigeration falls in its industry

65 Refrigeration equipment and su establishments

Safer than 26% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #9 safest of 12 Refrigeration equipment and su employers in California.

Ontario, United Refrigeration (34 employees, TCR 5.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 37 employees and a TCR of 2.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Ontario, United Refrigeration
Ontario, United Refrigeration (34 employees, TCR 5.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 37 employees and a TCR of 2.7

Ontario, United Refrigeration has fewer employees than the Refrigeration equipment and supplies, co median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2019 7.4 7.4 3 0 0
2018 8.2 0.0 3 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

423740 · CA · Ontario

65 Refrigeration equipment and supplies, commercial-type, merchant wholesalers employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 599 employers in Ontario, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Thermo King West Tolleson 5.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Allied Refrigeration Inc. 5.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Thermo King of Houston 5.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Follett LLC 5.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE Ardent Mills Yuba City 34 FTE
STATE-SIZE Filice Farms, L.P. 34 FTE
STATE-SIZE Alexander Ranch, Inc. 34 FTE
STATE-SIZE MFarms 34 FTE
CITY-NEAR Prime Healthcare Services Inc. Location: St. Mary's, Passaic LLC 46-3499370 (HP29) 10,997 FTE
CITY-NEAR CAONA - ONTARIO HUB 4,372 FTE
CITY-NEAR ONTARIO HUB (CAONA) 3,354 FTE
CITY-NEAR Atlantic Solutions Group Inc, Inc. DBA Empire Workforce Solutions 3,240 FTE
NAT-TCR FMCC 5.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Aptar Torrington 5.2 TCR
NAT-TCR IRIS USA, Inc. Surprise, AZ 5.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Headquarters 5.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE McGill Hose 34 FTE
NAT-SIZE Faf Phl 34 FTE
NAT-SIZE Dillman Brothers Contracting 34 FTE
NAT-SIZE Nash Mechanical, LLC 34 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.