Rubbish (i.e., nonhazardous solid waste) hauling, local · Florida

Operations/Hauling Division

Lakeland, FL · ~146 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
3.3
Avg TCR
2.6
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Operations/Hauling Division runs at 126% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Rubbish (i.e., nonhazardous solid waste) hauling, local workplace, earning a grade D.

Operations/Hauling Division: 3.3 TCR = 126% of Rubbish (i.e., nonhazardous solid waste) hauling, local BLS 2.6 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Operations/Hauling Division safety composite

Operations/Hauling Division scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 71% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 52%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

61/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 3.27 per 100 workers

Safer than 71% of industry peers

DART rate
C 2.83 per 100 workers

Safer than 55% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.8

2016→2024

Operations/Hauling Division injury rate improved

Operations/Hauling Division's TCR fell 2.8 from 6.7 in 2016 to 4.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2016 at 6.7 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.87× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=6.7 · 2018=0.7 · 2020=2.9 · 2021=0.6 · 2022=4.7 · 2023=3.4 · 2024=4.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 562111 · Lakeland, FL ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 3.3 · 126% of ind

  • DART 2.8 DART
  • RANK #51/155
  • PHOTO 4638-Alton HL
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 41 inj
  • SIZE ~146 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: 4638-Alton HL (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Florida employers → · Look up another →

Operations/Hauling Division in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Operations/Hauling Division averages 3.3 TCR (126% of the Rubbish (i.e., nonhazardous solid waste) hauling, local BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Operations/Hauling Division TCR series: 2016=6.7 · 2018=0.7 · 2020=2.9 · 2021=0.6 · 2022=4.7 · 2023=3.4 · 2024=4 · BLS 2.6

Where Operations/Hauling Division falls in its industry

2,322 Rubbish (i.e., nonhazardous so establishments

Safer than 71% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.1.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Florida alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #51 safest of 155 Rubbish (i.e., nonhazardous so employers in Florida.

Operations/Hauling Division (146 employees, TCR 3.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 5.1 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Operations/Hauling Division
Operations/Hauling Division (146 employees, TCR 3.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 5.1

Operations/Hauling Division has more employees than the Rubbish (i.e., nonhazardous solid waste) median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.1. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 4.0 2.8 7 0 0
2023 3.4 2.3 5 1 0
2022 4.7 2.3 7 1 0
2021 0.6 0.6 1 0 0
2020 2.9 1.4 4 0 0
2018 0.7 0.7 1 0 0
2016 6.7 5.0 16 4 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

562111 · FL · Lakeland

2,322 Rubbish (i.e., nonhazardous solid waste) hauling, local employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 26,569 rated employers in Florida with headcount on file · 426 employers in Lakeland, FL · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR 4638-Alton HL 3.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Advanced Disposal - Omro 3.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR S08901 - WV Roll Off Services 3.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR S00173 - Pasadena Building 3.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE W. Gardner, LLC 146 FTE
STATE-SIZE Sauer Construction, LLC 146 FTE
STATE-SIZE Southern Development & Construction, Inc. 146 FTE
STATE-SIZE Deme Construction LLC 146 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lakeland Regional Medical Center 5,518 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lakeland Distribution 2,927 FTE
CITY-NEAR Clinic 1,651 FTE
CITY-NEAR Amazon.com Services LLC - KLAL 1,210 FTE
NAT-TCR Monical's Pizza Willow Knolls 3.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Terminix Commercial 3.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Weber Display and Packaging 3.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Ardagh Glass Inc Seattle 3.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE Bingaman & Son Lumber, Kreamer Division 146 FTE
NAT-SIZE E. S. Wagner Company 146 FTE
NAT-SIZE Unverferth Manufacturing- Delphos Division 146 FTE
NAT-SIZE Ohio Aluminum Industries 146 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2018, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.