Pipe (e.g., heavy riveted, lock joint, seamless, welded) made from purchased iron or steel · Ohio

OPW Engineered Systems

Lebanon, OH · ~126 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.2
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

OPW Engineered Systems runs at 35% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Pipe (e.g., heavy riveted, lock joint, seamless, welded) made from purchased iron or steel workplace, earning a grade A.

OPW Engineered Systems: 1.2 TCR = 35% of Pipe (e.g., heavy riveted, lock joint, seamless, welded) made from purchased iron or steel BLS 3.3 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

OPW Engineered Systems safety composite

OPW Engineered Systems scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 89% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

78/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 1.17 per 100 workers

Safer than 89% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 86% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.6

2016→2020

OPW Engineered Systems injury rate improved

OPW Engineered Systems's TCR fell 1.6 from 1.6 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2020. Peak filing year was 2018 at 2.8 TCR. In 2020, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=1.6 · 2017=0.7 · 2018=2.8 · 2019=0.7 · 2020=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 331210 · Lebanon, OH AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 1.2 · 35% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #3/34
  • PHOTO TN Tennessee, LLC
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 8 inj
  • SIZE ~126 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: TN Tennessee, LLC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Ohio employers → · Look up another →

OPW Engineered Systems in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows OPW Engineered Systems averages 1.2 TCR (35% of the Pipe (e.g., heavy riveted, lock joint, seamless, welded) made from purchased iron or steel BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

OPW Engineered Systems TCR series: 2016=1.6 · 2017=0.7 · 2018=2.8 · 2019=0.7 · 2020=0 · BLS 3.3

Where OPW Engineered Systems falls in its industry

329 Pipe (e.g., heavy riveted, loc establishments

Safer than 89% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Ohio alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #3 safest of 34 Pipe (e.g., heavy riveted, loc employers in Ohio.

OPW Engineered Systems (126 employees, TCR 1.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 99 employees and a TCR of 4.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate OPW Engineered Systems
OPW Engineered Systems (126 employees, TCR 1.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 99 employees and a TCR of 4.3

OPW Engineered Systems has more employees than the Pipe (e.g., heavy riveted, lock joint, s median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.7 0.7 1 0 0
2018 2.8 1.4 4 0 0
2017 0.7 0.7 1 0 0
2016 1.6 0.8 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

331210 · OH · Lebanon

329 Pipe (e.g., heavy riveted, lock joint, seamless, welded) made from purchased iron or steel employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,650 rated employers in Ohio with headcount on file · 69 employers in Lebanon, OH · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR TN Tennessee, LLC 1.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Nucor Tubular Products 1.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Cleveland-Cliffs Tubular Components - Walbridge 1.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Alleima USA LLC - Scranton 1.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE Weaver Bros. Inc. Main Plant 126 FTE
STATE-SIZE Hatchery 126 FTE
STATE-SIZE Brecon Service Center 126 FTE
STATE-SIZE Marker, Inc. 126 FTE
CITY-NEAR ADVICS Ohio Manufacturing, Inc. 979 FTE
CITY-NEAR Mane Inc. Lebanon Production 588 FTE
CITY-NEAR Ralph J. Stolle Countryside YMCA 561 FTE
CITY-NEAR Miami Valley Gaming and Racing, LLC 427 FTE
NAT-TCR Beautycounter HQ 1.2 TCR
NAT-TCR LAX project 1.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Sodexo at Tesoro 1.2 TCR
NAT-TCR CSC Orlando 1967 1.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE Bird Incorporated dba CertainTeed Corporation 126 FTE
NAT-SIZE Veneer Tech 126 FTE
NAT-SIZE Hotel Duval 126 FTE
NAT-SIZE Lake Manassas Health & Rehabilitation Center 126 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.