Convalescent homes or convalescent hospitals (except psychiatric) · Ohio

Tuscany Gardens

Pataskala, OH · ~126 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
16.3
Avg TCR
6.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Tuscany Gardens runs at 251% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Convalescent homes or convalescent hospitals (except psychiatric) workplace, earning a grade F.

Tuscany Gardens: 16.3 TCR = 251% of Convalescent homes or convalescent hospitals (except psychiatric) BLS 6.5 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Tuscany Gardens safety composite

Tuscany Gardens scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 3%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

17/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 16.32 per 100 workers

Safer than 9% of industry peers

DART rate
F 28.09 per 100 workers

Safer than 3% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Tuscany Gardens: 4.8 → 28.1 TCR

Peak year 2022 @ 65.4 TCR · DART/TCR 1.72× in 2024

Tuscany Gardens's TCR rose 23.2 from 4.8 in 2016 to 28.1 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 65.4 TCR. In 2024, DART was 1.72× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623110 · Pataskala, OH ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 16.3 · 251% of ind

  • DART 28.1 DART
  • RANK #955/1074
  • PHOTO Azalea Health and Re…
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 36 inj
  • SIZE ~126 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Azalea Health and Rehab Center (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Ohio employers → · Look up another →

Tuscany Gardens in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Tuscany Gardens averages 16.3 TCR (251% of the Convalescent homes or convalescent hospitals (except psychiatric) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Tuscany Gardens TCR series: 2016=4.8 · 2017=4.8 · 2018=3.9 · 2019=7.8 · 2020=21.2 · 2021=41.8 · 2022=65.4 · 2023=18.1 · 2024=28.1 · BLS 6.5

Where Tuscany Gardens falls in its industry

15,252 Convalescent homes or convales establishments

Safer than 9% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Ohio alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #955 safest of 1074 Convalescent homes or convales employers in Ohio.

Tuscany Gardens (126 employees, TCR 16.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Tuscany Gardens
Tuscany Gardens (126 employees, TCR 16.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6

Tuscany Gardens has more employees than the Convalescent homes or convalescent hospi median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 28.1 28.1 3 27 0
2023 18.1 12.5 7 9 0
2022 65.4 63.3 3 57 0
2021 41.8 39.6 2 36 0
2020 21.2 21.2 0 20 0
2019 7.8 3.9 8 0 0
2018 3.9 1.9 4 0 0
2017 4.8 3.8 4 1 0
2016 4.8 3.9 5 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623110 · OH · Pataskala

15,252 Convalescent homes or convalescent hospitals (except psychiatric) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,650 rated employers in Ohio with headcount on file · 40 employers in Pataskala, OH · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Azalea Health and Rehab Center 16.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR GARDNER HEIGHTS HEALTH CARE CENTERAPPLE REHAB 16.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Balfour Retirement Community 16.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Cambridge Operator LLC 16.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE Weaver Bros. Inc. Main Plant 126 FTE
STATE-SIZE Hatchery 126 FTE
STATE-SIZE Brecon Service Center 126 FTE
STATE-SIZE Marker, Inc. 126 FTE
CITY-NEAR Newell Brands Home Fragrance Division 593 FTE
CITY-NEAR ascena Etna Distribution Center 585 FTE
CITY-NEAR Illuminate USA 555 FTE
CITY-NEAR Coty Pataskala WHS 471 FTE
NAT-TCR Public Works 16.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Trader Joe's 0159 Spokane 16.3 TCR
NAT-TCR TNN006 16.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Azalea Health and Rehab Center 16.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE Schwaab, Inc. 126 FTE
NAT-SIZE Giant Eagle #0016 126 FTE
NAT-SIZE Northwest Iowa Pork 126 FTE
NAT-SIZE Murfreesboro - D032 126 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.