Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · Arizona

Orchard Pointe Terrazza

Peoria, AZ · ~75 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
8.3
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Orchard Pointe Terrazza runs at 218% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade F.

Orchard Pointe Terrazza: 8.3 TCR = 218% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Orchard Pointe Terrazza safety composite

Orchard Pointe Terrazza scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 40%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

43/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 8.3 per 100 workers

Safer than 42% of industry peers

DART rate
D 4.51 per 100 workers

Safer than 40% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−4.8

2021→2024

Orchard Pointe Terrazza injury rate improved

Orchard Pointe Terrazza's TCR fell 4.8 from 10.9 in 2021 to 6.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 11.9 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.54× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2021=10.9 · 2022=11.9 · 2023=4.5 · 2024=6.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Peoria, AZ ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 8.3 · 218% of ind

  • DART 4.5 DART
  • RANK #77/173
  • PHOTO Capriana
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 18 inj
  • SIZE ~75 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Capriana (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Arizona employers → · Look up another →

Orchard Pointe Terrazza in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Orchard Pointe Terrazza averages 8.3 TCR (218% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Orchard Pointe Terrazza TCR series: 2021=10.9 · 2022=11.9 · 2023=4.5 · 2024=6 · BLS 3.8

Where Orchard Pointe Terrazza falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 42% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Arizona alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #77 safest of 173 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in Arizona.

Orchard Pointe Terrazza (75 employees, TCR 8.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Orchard Pointe Terrazza
Orchard Pointe Terrazza (75 employees, TCR 8.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

Orchard Pointe Terrazza has more employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 6.0 4.5 4 0 0
2023 4.5 3.0 3 0 0
2022 11.9 10.2 5 2 0
2021 10.9 3.6 6 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · AZ · Peoria

6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 9,594 rated employers in Arizona with headcount on file · 170 employers in Peoria, AZ · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Capriana 8.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Brookdale Echelon Lake 8.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Table Rock Memory Care Community 8.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Artisan DePere 8.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE Eagle Mountain Construction 75 FTE
STATE-SIZE Meritage Homes of California - Southern California Division 75 FTE
STATE-SIZE William Lyon Homes, Inc. - AZ Division 75 FTE
STATE-SIZE Sonoran Foothills (Sunbelt) 75 FTE
CITY-NEAR Rapid Recovery 2,552 FTE
CITY-NEAR Ono-507 910 FTE
CITY-NEAR Ono-506 909 FTE
CITY-NEAR 1533 401 FTE
NAT-TCR Mesa Developmental Services 8.3 TCR
NAT-TCR iFit Smithfield Production Facility 8.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Amazon.com Services LLC - DTB2 8.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Trident Building Systems, LLC 8.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE International Paper - Atglen Container 75 FTE
NAT-SIZE D.R. Horton, Inc. - Midwest (Columbus) 75 FTE
NAT-SIZE Mecklenburg County Jail Central 75 FTE
NAT-SIZE Eagle Railcar Services - Cairo, Ohio, LLC 75 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.