Surgical implants manufacturing · Michigan

Orchid Macdee LLC dba Orchid Chelsea

Chelsea, MI · ~133 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.1
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Orchid Macdee LLC dba Orchid Chelsea runs at 64% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Surgical implants manufacturing workplace, earning a grade B.

Orchid Macdee LLC dba Orchid Chelsea: 2.1 TCR = 64% of Surgical implants manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Orchid Macdee LLC dba Orchid Chelsea safety composite

Orchid Macdee LLC dba Orchid Chelsea scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 49%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

50/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 2.1 per 100 workers

Safer than 49% of industry peers

DART rate
D 0.69 per 100 workers

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−3.3

2019→2023

Orchid Macdee LLC dba Orchid Chelsea injury rate improved

Orchid Macdee LLC dba Orchid Chelsea's TCR fell 3.3 from 4.0 in 2019 to 0.7 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2019 at 4.0 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0.33× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2019=4.0 · 2020=2.5 · 2021=0.8 · 2022=2.6 · 2023=0.7

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 339113 · Chelsea, MI AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade B · TCR 2.1 · 64% of ind

  • DART 0.7 DART
  • RANK #7/20
  • PHOTO Tecomet 170
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 15 inj
  • SIZE ~133 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Tecomet 170 (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Michigan employers → · Look up another →

Orchid Macdee LLC dba Orchid Chelsea in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Orchid Macdee LLC dba Orchid Chelsea averages 2.1 TCR (64% of the Surgical implants manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Orchid Macdee LLC dba Orchid Chelsea TCR series: 2019=4 · 2020=2.5 · 2021=0.8 · 2022=2.6 · 2023=0.7 · BLS 3.3

Where Orchid Macdee LLC dba Orchid Chelsea falls in its industry

555 Surgical implants manufacturin establishments

Safer than 49% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.1.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Michigan alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #7 safest of 20 Surgical implants manufacturin employers in Michigan.

Orchid Macdee LLC dba Orchid Chelsea (133 employees, TCR 2.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 123 employees and a TCR of 2.1 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,0002,500 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Orchid Macdee LLC dba Orchid Chelsea
Orchid Macdee LLC dba Orchid Chelsea (133 employees, TCR 2.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 123 employees and a TCR of 2.1

Orchid Macdee LLC dba Orchid Chelsea has more employees than the Surgical implants manufacturing median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.1. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 0.7 0.7 1 0 0
2022 2.6 0.7 4 0 0
2021 0.8 0.0 1 0 0
2020 2.5 0.0 3 0 0
2019 4.0 0.7 6 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

339113 · MI · Chelsea

555 Surgical implants manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,393 rated employers in Michigan with headcount on file · 27 employers in Chelsea, MI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Tecomet 170 2.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Stryker Jr- Anaheim, CA 2.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR EBI Patient Care 2.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Medtronic Xomed, Inc 2.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Power Line Supply - ALL 133 FTE
STATE-SIZE Davenport Masonry, Inc 133 FTE
STATE-SIZE USA MI Farmington Hills 133 FTE
STATE-SIZE Iceberg Enterprises 133 FTE
CITY-NEAR St. Joseph Mercy Chelsea Hospital 1,135 FTE
CITY-NEAR Chelsea Proving Grounds 636 FTE
CITY-NEAR United Methodist Retirement Communities 411 FTE
CITY-NEAR Sheridan Books, Inc. 329 FTE
NAT-TCR Rxr Ny Pm Foxtrot LLC 2.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Adams County Care Center, LLC 2.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Skyworks LLC -- Rochester branch 2.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Hotwire Communications - Cypress 2.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE Rxr Co Property Management LLC 133 FTE
NAT-SIZE Parks & Recreation 133 FTE
NAT-SIZE Kimball International Logistics 133 FTE
NAT-SIZE Charles C Parks Company 133 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.