Industry profile · NAICS 339113

Surgical dressings manufacturing

Workplace injury rates across 620 OSHA-reporting establishments in this industry, 2016–2024.

620
Employers
3.1
Avg TCR
3.3
BLS benchmark
8,612
Injuries

The industry picture

Employers in Surgical dressings manufacturing average 3.1 recordable injuries per 100 workers, below the BLS national benchmark of 3.3.

3.1
avg TCR · reporting employers
3.3
BLS national benchmark
620
employers reporting
8,612
recordable injuries

OSHA-reporting establishments skew toward larger, higher-hazard sites, so the reporting average runs above the BLS all-establishment benchmark.

What Surgical dressings manufacturing Safety Data Reveals

The Surgical dressings manufacturing sector (NAICS 339113) encompasses 620 distinct employer establishments currently reporting to OSHA's Injury Tracking Application. Across this cohort, workers have logged 8,612 recordable injuries during the 2016–2024 reporting window, producing an industry-weighted average Total Case Rate (TCR) of 3.1 injuries per 100 full-time workers per year. Because OSHA's ITA mandates submission from establishments with 250+ employees plus all high-hazard industries at 20+ employees, this dataset represents a structural slice of U.S. workplace risk rather than a voluntary sample.

The Bureau of Labor Statistics publishes a separate national benchmark TCR of 3.3 for this NAICS code, derived from the BLS Survey of Occupational Injuries and Illnesses. Comparing the two, the ITA-reported rate of 3.1 is below the BLS benchmark, a gap that typically widens when the industry contains many large, high-exposure establishments required to file ITA reports. Employers in the table below are sorted so you can see how far individual establishments deviate from both the industry average and the national benchmark.

The practical value of industry-level safety data is threefold. First, jobseekers can gauge whether a prospective employer is better or worse than its industry peers, not just absolute injury counts, which tilt toward larger payrolls. Second, insurers and workers' compensation carriers use sector TCR as a baseline for experience-modification adjustments. Third, safety professionals benchmark their own programs against the cohort median. Use the grade-sorted employer list below to identify specific establishments within Surgical dressings manufacturing that outperform or underperform the sector average, and click through to each record for year-by-year injury, illness, and fatality breakdowns.

Employers in this industry, by injury rate

Page 1 of 13
Employer LocationGradeAvg TCR
American performance Polymers Colebrook, NH F 27.3
Brownmed - Spirit Lake Spirit Lake, IA F 20.6
21st Century Scientific, Inc. Coeur D'Alene, ID F 20.4
Glenwood AR Location Glenwood, AR F 16.9
Molnlycke Manufacturing US - T&P Wiscasset, ME F 16.0
Csc 3004 Houston, TX F 14.4
Proterial Cable America, Inc. CT North Stonington, CT F 14.2
SWR205 Marietta, GA F 13.6
Alpha Protech Salt Lake City, UT F 13.1
Service 5204 Sacramento, CA F 12.9
Ken-Mar Machine Manufacturing Corp Paterson, NJ F 12.4
Inspired by Drive Santa Fe Springs, CA F 12.2
Csc 3000 Phoenix, AZ F 11.9
B & D Independence LLC Mount Carmel, IL F 11.8
Trulife Bellingham Bellingham, WA F 11.0
Jersey Shore Wall Township, NJ F 11.0
Echo Ridge Flagstaff, AZ F 11.0
Royal Precision Plastics Powell, TN F 10.7
Molnlycke Manufacturing US - SWC Wiscasset, ME F 10.5
Csc 3010 Sacramento, CA F 10.5
Stryker Sustainability Solutions Phoenix, AZ F 10.0
Showa Best Glove, Inc. Fayette Division Fayette, AL F 9.9
Warwick, RI Warwick, RI F 9.8
Copan Diagnostics Carlsbad, CA F 9.8
Consolidated Sterilizer Systems Billerica, MA F 9.3
DeRoyal LaFollette Lafollette, TN F 9.3
Lancs Industries Albuquerque, NM F 9.3
Andover healthcare inc. Salisbury, MA F 9.1
SWR030 Bridgeville, PA F 8.8
Phoenix 1 Phoenix, AZ F 8.8
Harry J. Lawall and Son - Langhorne Langhorne, PA F 8.7
Galvion Portsmouth Portsmouth Nh. 03801, NH F 8.7
Pride Mobility Mississippi Pontotoc, MS F 8.6
SWR009 West Chester, PA F 8.5
Medical West Flagstaff, AZ F 8.4
8028 Frankford Philadelphia, PA F 8.4
Higgins Supply Co., Inc. Mcgraw, NY F 8.4
Stryker Sustainability Solutions - Chandler Chandler, AZ F 8.2
WestBridge Vocational Sylva, NC F 8.2
IN- Medical Depot, Inc. Greenwood, IN F 8.1
ADM Antioch, CA F 8.1
Labconco - Fort Scott Fort Scott, KS F 8.0
Boekel Industries, Inc Feasterville, PA F 8.0
Stryker Sustanibility Solutions FL Lakeland, FL F 7.9
College Park Industries- Warren Warren, MI F 7.8
Coldstar International Bristol, TN F 7.8
Hitachi Cable America Inc., High Performance Medical Solutions Division (CT Facility) North Stonington, CT F 7.7
Copan Industries Inc. Aguadilla, PR F 7.7
C.G. Laboratories, Inc. Granbury, TX F 7.7
Winco Mfg., LLC Ocala, FL F 7.7
Page 1 of 13 Next →
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainSafetyScore Editorial

Verify with BLS →

Verify with OSHA →

Working in Surgical dressings manufacturing?

This sector averages 3.1 against a BLS benchmark of 3.3 - but individual employers span the full A-to-F range.

Sector figures use the credible-subset mean across reporting employers; a benchmark is not any single establishment's measured rate.

Every figure and grade on PlainSafetyScore is computed directly from OSHA's published Injury Tracking Application data and BLS industry benchmarks, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these safety grades, or report a data error. Data current as of 2016-2024 OSHA ITA release.