Airport passenger screening security services · Illinois

Ord Chicago O Hare International Ai

Chicago, IL · ~29 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
3.8
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Ord Chicago O Hare International Ai runs at 84% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Airport passenger screening security services workplace, earning a grade C.

Ord Chicago O Hare International Ai: 3.8 TCR = 84% of Airport passenger screening security services BLS 4.5 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Ord Chicago O Hare International Ai safety composite

Ord Chicago O Hare International Ai scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 81% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 42%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

58/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 3.79 per 100 workers

Safer than 42% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 81% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Ord Chicago O Hare International Ai held a steady TCR band

Ord Chicago O Hare International Ai's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2022 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 11.4 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2022=0.0 · 2023=11.4 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 488190 · Chicago, IL AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 3.8 · 84% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #18/26
  • PHOTO Signature Flight Sup…
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 2 inj
  • SIZE ~29 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Signature Flight Support SJC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Illinois employers → · Look up another →

Ord Chicago O Hare International Ai in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Ord Chicago O Hare International Ai averages 3.8 TCR (84% of the Airport passenger screening security services BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Ord Chicago O Hare International Ai TCR series: 2022=0 · 2023=11.4 · 2024=0 · BLS 4.5

Where Ord Chicago O Hare International Ai falls in its industry

992 Airport passenger screening se establishments

Safer than 42% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Illinois alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #18 safest of 26 Airport passenger screening se employers in Illinois.

Ord Chicago O Hare International Ai (29 employees, TCR 3.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 67 employees and a TCR of 3.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Ord Chicago O Hare International Ai
Ord Chicago O Hare International Ai (29 employees, TCR 3.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 67 employees and a TCR of 3.2

Ord Chicago O Hare International Ai has fewer employees than the Airport passenger screening security ser median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 11.4 11.4 2 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

488190 · IL · Chicago

992 Airport passenger screening security services employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,804 rated employers in Illinois with headcount on file · 2,934 employers in Chicago, IL · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Signature Flight Support SJC 3.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR DI - Joint Base Andrews (VIPSAM) 3.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR ACS_MIAMI_FL 3.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Customs Border Protection Oklahoma 3.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE Grant Park 29 FTE
STATE-SIZE AMEREN ILLINOIS - Southern - IL Common Ops 29 FTE
STATE-SIZE AMEREN ILLINOIS - Western - IL Common Ops 29 FTE
STATE-SIZE AMEREN ILLINOIS - Eastern - IL Common Ops 29 FTE
CITY-NEAR Chicago Public Schools 49,500 FTE
CITY-NEAR Chicago/Corporate 18,831 FTE
CITY-NEAR University of Illinois at Chicago 13,092 FTE
CITY-NEAR University Health Service UIC UIC Campus 12,732 FTE
NAT-TCR Primrose Retirement Community of Lima 3.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Store 200 3.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Fort Smith Ar - 827 3.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Greenleaf Gardens, LLC 3.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE Mtj Montrose Regional Airport 29 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sweetwater Retirement Community 29 FTE
NAT-SIZE Country View 29 FTE
NAT-SIZE Ridge View 29 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.