Building materials supply dealers · Oregon

Oregon Administration Offices

Portland, OR · ~33 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.0
Avg TCR
3.4
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Oregon Administration Offices runs at 60% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Building materials supply dealers workplace, earning a grade B.

Oregon Administration Offices: 2.0 TCR = 60% of Building materials supply dealers BLS 3.4 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Oregon Administration Offices safety composite

Oregon Administration Offices scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 86% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

76/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 2.03 per 100 workers

Safer than 86% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 82% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−6.6

2018→2023

Oregon Administration Offices injury rate improved

Oregon Administration Offices's TCR fell 6.6 from 6.6 in 2018 to 0.0 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2018 at 6.6 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=6.6 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=5.6 · 2023=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 444190 · Portland, OR AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 2.0 · 60% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #4/42
  • PHOTO MID-SOUTH LUMBER CO.…
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 1 inj
  • SIZE ~33 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: MID-SOUTH LUMBER CO. OF NORTHWEST FLORIDA, INC. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Oregon employers → · Look up another →

Oregon Administration Offices in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Oregon Administration Offices averages 2.0 TCR (60% of the Building materials supply dealers BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Oregon Administration Offices TCR series: 2018=6.6 · 2019=0 · 2020=0 · 2021=0 · 2022=5.6 · 2023=0 · BLS 3.4

Where Oregon Administration Offices falls in its industry

1,643 Building materials supply deal establishments

Safer than 86% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Oregon alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #4 safest of 42 Building materials supply deal employers in Oregon.

Oregon Administration Offices (33 employees, TCR 2.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 35 employees and a TCR of 5.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Oregon Administration Offices
Oregon Administration Offices (33 employees, TCR 2.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 35 employees and a TCR of 5.2

Oregon Administration Offices has fewer employees than the Building materials supply dealers median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 5.6 0.0 1 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 6.6 0.0 0 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

444190 · OR · Portland

1,643 Building materials supply dealers employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 8,031 rated employers in Oregon with headcount on file · 1,728 employers in Portland, OR · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR MID-SOUTH LUMBER CO. OF NORTHWEST FLORIDA, INC. 2.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR CARTER LUMBER 242 2.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR KIGHT HOME CENTER 492 2.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Lampert Lumber HQ - St Paul MN 2.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Wooden Shoe Bulb Co dba Wooden Shoe Tulip Farm 33 FTE
STATE-SIZE OR-Central/Exley 33 FTE
STATE-SIZE OR-Parkrose 33 FTE
STATE-SIZE Sharpcor, Inc. - Oregon 33 FTE
CITY-NEAR OHSU Main Campus 18,003 FTE
CITY-NEAR OR349 PROVIDENCE ST VINCENT MEDICAL CTR-PORTLA 4,033 FTE
CITY-NEAR OR346 PROVIDENCE PORTLAND MEDICAL CTR-PORTLAND 3,684 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2252-00000530 3,498 FTE
NAT-TCR 1220 Exhibits, Inc 2.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Market Basket #43 2.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Market Basket #76 2.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Smith Douglas R 2.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE East Vancouver Ready Mix 33 FTE
NAT-SIZE Juvenile Detention Center 33 FTE
NAT-SIZE Espanola Transit Mix, LLC 33 FTE
NAT-SIZE Les Schwab Tire Center-East Wenatchee 33 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.