Group homes for the visually impaired · Oregon

Oregon Youth Authority Central Office

Salem, OR · ~167 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.2
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Oregon Youth Authority Central Office runs at 6% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Group homes for the visually impaired workplace, earning a grade A.

Oregon Youth Authority Central Office: 0.2 TCR = 6% of Group homes for the visually impaired BLS 3.8 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Oregon Youth Authority Central Office safety composite

Oregon Youth Authority Central Office scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 99% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

75/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0.24 per 100 workers

Safer than 99% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0.73 per 100 workers

Safer than 65% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Oregon Youth Authority Central Office: 0.0 → 0.7 TCR

Peak year 2020 @ 0.7 TCR · DART/TCR 3.04× in 2020

Oregon Youth Authority Central Office's TCR rose 0.7 from 0.0 in 2016 to 0.7 in 2020. In 2020, DART was 3.04× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623990 · Salem, OR AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 0.2 · 6% of ind

  • DART 0.7 DART
  • RANK #1/7
  • PHOTO All Jackson Locations
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 1 inj
  • SIZE ~167 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: All Jackson Locations (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Oregon employers → · Look up another →

Oregon Youth Authority Central Office in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Oregon Youth Authority Central Office averages 0.2 TCR (6% of the Group homes for the visually impaired BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Oregon Youth Authority Central Office TCR series: 2016=0 · 2017=0 · 2020=0.7 · BLS 3.8

Where Oregon Youth Authority Central Office falls in its industry

560 Group homes for the visually i establishments

Safer than 99% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.4.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Oregon alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #1 safest of 7 Group homes for the visually i employers in Oregon.

Oregon Youth Authority Central Office (167 employees, TCR 0.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 64 employees and a TCR of 6.4 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Oregon Youth Authority Central Office
Oregon Youth Authority Central Office (167 employees, TCR 0.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 64 employees and a TCR of 6.4

Oregon Youth Authority Central Office has more employees than the Group homes for the visually impaired median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.4. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2020 0.7 0.7 1 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623990 · OR · Salem

560 Group homes for the visually impaired employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 8,031 rated employers in Oregon with headcount on file · 471 employers in Salem, OR · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR All Jackson Locations 0.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Health at Home 0.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Hilltop Health Services Corporation- 3325 North Townsend 0.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR NEW ALTERNATIVES, INC - SCSD 0.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE Hubbard_Potelco 167 FTE
STATE-SIZE Pacific Star Communications, Inc. 167 FTE
STATE-SIZE ABS-0019-0018-00574 FAC-00574-SPRINGFIELD-OR 167 FTE
STATE-SIZE SWY-0019-0019-01659 FAC-01659-ALBANY-OR 167 FTE
CITY-NEAR Oregon State Hospital-Salem Campus 2,036 FTE
CITY-NEAR North America Fulfillment Centers (FCs) : PDX7 1,559 FTE
CITY-NEAR Chemeketa Community College 1,551 FTE
CITY-NEAR Human Service Building ODHS 1,402 FTE
NAT-TCR TS Power Plant 0.2 TCR
NAT-TCR CSP Corporate Headquarters 0.2 TCR
NAT-TCR SealedAir Hudson 0.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Shelbyville Distribution Center, Sanford Division 0.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE Assessor/ Recorder 167 FTE
NAT-SIZE Big Tex Trailer Manufacturing, LLC. - Cordele 167 FTE
NAT-SIZE Old Orchard Health Care Center 167 FTE
NAT-SIZE Lehigh Valley Hospital - Health and Wellness Center 167 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2020, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.