General warehousing and storage · Tennessee

Shelbyville Distribution Center, Sanford Division

Shelbyville, TN · ~249 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.2
Avg TCR
5.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Shelbyville Distribution Center, Sanford Division runs at 4% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical General warehousing and storage workplace, earning a grade A.

Shelbyville Distribution Center, Sanford Division: 0.2 TCR = 4% of General warehousing and storage BLS 5.8 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Shelbyville Distribution Center, Sanford Division safety composite

Shelbyville Distribution Center, Sanford Division scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 100% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

83/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0.24 per 100 workers

Safer than 100% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 86% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Shelbyville Distribution Center, Sanford Division held a steady TCR band

Shelbyville Distribution Center, Sanford Division's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2017 to 0.0 in 2019. Peak filing year was 2018 at 0.7 TCR. In 2019, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=0.0 · 2018=0.7 · 2019=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 493110 · Shelbyville, TN AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 0.2 · 4% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #4/297
  • PHOTO Estee Lauder - MWDC
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 2 inj
  • SIZE ~249 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Estee Lauder - MWDC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Tennessee employers → · Look up another →

Shelbyville Distribution Center, Sanford Division in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Shelbyville Distribution Center, Sanford Division averages 0.2 TCR (4% of the General warehousing and storage BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Shelbyville Distribution Center, Sanford Division TCR series: 2017=0 · 2018=0.7 · 2019=0 · BLS 5.8

Where Shelbyville Distribution Center, Sanford Division falls in its industry

9,477 General warehousing and storag establishments

Safer than 100% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Tennessee alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #4 safest of 297 General warehousing and storag employers in Tennessee.

Shelbyville Distribution Center, Sanford Division (249 employees, TCR 0.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 92 employees and a TCR of 3.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,0005,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Shelbyville Distribution Center, Sanford Division
Shelbyville Distribution Center, Sanford Division (249 employees, TCR 0.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 92 employees and a TCR of 3.5

Shelbyville Distribution Center, Sanford Division has more employees than the General warehousing and storage median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 0.7 0.4 2 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

493110 · TN · Shelbyville

9,477 General warehousing and storage employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,743 rated employers in Tennessee with headcount on file · 56 employers in Shelbyville, TN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Estee Lauder - MWDC 0.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR CA - LOreal 0.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR FedEx Supply Chain MGH-Blacklick 0.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Fairburn (Oakley Industrial Blvd.) 0.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE Specialty Tires of America (TN), LLC 249 FTE
STATE-SIZE Knoxville 249 FTE
STATE-SIZE 238 249 FTE
STATE-SIZE 4533 249 FTE
CITY-NEAR Shelbyville Plant 1,399 FTE
CITY-NEAR Bedford County Board of Education 1,034 FTE
CITY-NEAR BIG G EXPRESS INC 623 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 6062 588 FTE
NAT-TCR SealedAir Hudson 0.2 TCR
NAT-TCR CSP Corporate Headquarters 0.2 TCR
NAT-TCR 102925 - Boeing Factory Transformation 0.2 TCR
NAT-TCR NC0014C300 0.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE Chemring Ordnance, Inc. 249 FTE
NAT-SIZE Pierceton - Instruments & Implants 249 FTE
NAT-SIZE Martin Engineering - Neponset 249 FTE
NAT-SIZE Beautycounter HQ 249 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.