Other Heavy and Civil Engineering Construction · Florida

Orlando Utility Commission

Orlando, FL · ~86 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.1
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Orlando Utility Commission runs at 5% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Other Heavy and Civil Engineering Construction workplace, earning a grade A.

Orlando Utility Commission: 0.1 TCR = 5% of Other Heavy and Civil Engineering Construction BLS 2.8 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Orlando Utility Commission safety composite

Orlando Utility Commission scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 96% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 52%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

77/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0.14 per 100 workers

Safer than 96% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 73% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Orlando Utility Commission held a steady TCR band

Orlando Utility Commission's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2017 at 1.1 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=0.0 · 2017=1.1 · 2018=0.0 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 237990 · Orlando, FL AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 0.1 · 5% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #1/60
  • PHOTO CIANBRO PITTSFIELD
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 1 inj
  • SIZE ~86 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: CIANBRO PITTSFIELD (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Florida employers → · Look up another →

Orlando Utility Commission in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Orlando Utility Commission averages 0.1 TCR (5% of the Other Heavy and Civil Engineering Construction BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Orlando Utility Commission TCR series: 2016=0 · 2017=1.1 · 2018=0 · 2019=0 · 2020=0 · 2021=0 · 2022=0 · 2023=0 · BLS 2.8

Where Orlando Utility Commission falls in its industry

932 Other Heavy and Civil Engineer establishments

Safer than 96% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Florida alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #1 safest of 60 Other Heavy and Civil Engineer employers in Florida.

Orlando Utility Commission (86 employees, TCR 0.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 69 employees and a TCR of 1.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Orlando Utility Commission
Orlando Utility Commission (86 employees, TCR 0.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 69 employees and a TCR of 1.5

Orlando Utility Commission has more employees than the Other Heavy and Civil Engineering Constr median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 1.1 0.0 1 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

237990 · FL · Orlando

932 Other Heavy and Civil Engineering Construction employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 26,569 rated employers in Florida with headcount on file · 1,997 employers in Orlando, FL · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR CIANBRO PITTSFIELD 0.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR 103176 - E360 Bellevue to Redmond 0.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Total LP 0.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Cianbro Constructors LLC 0.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Citrus County Combined Cycle Plant 86 FTE
STATE-SIZE Hines Energy Complex 86 FTE
STATE-SIZE Main Office - Orlando 86 FTE
STATE-SIZE Suwannee Valley Electric Cooperative 86 FTE
CITY-NEAR Universal Orlando Resort 20,343 FTE
CITY-NEAR Universal Parks and Resorts : UO 13,442 FTE
CITY-NEAR ADVENTHEALTH ORLANDO 11,412 FTE
CITY-NEAR Florida Hospital Orlando 10,318 FTE
NAT-TCR Total LP 0.1 TCR
NAT-TCR IES Communications, LLC - Tempe 0.1 TCR
NAT-TCR SIE - Naughty Dog 0.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Kashi Sales Facility 0.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE VibraLife of Katy 86 FTE
NAT-SIZE Eversource - Norwalk Elec 86 FTE
NAT-SIZE Willow Springs Care and Rehabilitation 86 FTE
NAT-SIZE Apparatus, LLC 86 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.