Skilled nursing facilities · Washington

Willow Springs Care and Rehabilitation

Yakima, WA · ~86 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
17.6
Avg TCR
6.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Willow Springs Care and Rehabilitation runs at 271% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Skilled nursing facilities workplace, earning a grade F.

Willow Springs Care and Rehabilitation: 17.6 TCR = 271% of Skilled nursing facilities BLS 6.5 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Willow Springs Care and Rehabilitation safety composite

Willow Springs Care and Rehabilitation scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 8%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

30/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 17.62 per 100 workers

Safer than 8% of industry peers

DART rate
D 4.62 per 100 workers

Safer than 39% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−10.8

2016→2023

Willow Springs Care and Rehabilitation injury rate improved

Willow Springs Care and Rehabilitation's TCR fell 10.8 from 16.9 in 2016 to 6.2 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2020 at 49.1 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0.26× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=16.9 · 2017=20.4 · 2018=6.3 · 2019=10.0 · 2020=49.1 · 2021=14.4 · 2023=6.2

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623110 · Yakima, WA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 17.6 · 271% of ind

  • DART 4.6 DART
  • RANK #164/190
  • PHOTO Madison Center
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 55 inj
  • SIZE ~86 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Madison Center (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Washington employers → · Look up another →

Willow Springs Care and Rehabilitation in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Willow Springs Care and Rehabilitation averages 17.6 TCR (271% of the Skilled nursing facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Willow Springs Care and Rehabilitation TCR series: 2016=16.9 · 2017=20.4 · 2018=6.3 · 2019=10 · 2020=49.1 · 2021=14.4 · 2023=6.2 · BLS 6.5

Where Willow Springs Care and Rehabilitation falls in its industry

15,252 Skilled nursing facilities establishments

Safer than 8% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Washington alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #164 safest of 190 Skilled nursing facilities employers in Washington.

Willow Springs Care and Rehabilitation (86 employees, TCR 17.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Willow Springs Care and Rehabilitation
Willow Springs Care and Rehabilitation (86 employees, TCR 17.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6

Willow Springs Care and Rehabilitation has fewer employees than the Skilled nursing facilities median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 6.2 4.6 4 0 0
2021 14.4 9.6 3 6 0
2020 49.1 49.1 6 22 0
2019 10.0 7.2 7 0 0
2018 6.3 3.8 5 0 0
2017 20.4 11.5 16 0 0
2016 16.9 8.5 14 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623110 · WA · Yakima

15,252 Skilled nursing facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,147 rated employers in Washington with headcount on file · 192 employers in Yakima, WA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Madison Center 17.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Richardson SNF Operations, LP D/B/A The Plaza at Richardson 17.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Portland Center for Assisted Living 17.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR South Ogden Post Acute 17.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE A&R Solar - Washington 86 FTE
STATE-SIZE Peninsula Light Company 86 FTE
STATE-SIZE Fleet_Potelco 86 FTE
STATE-SIZE Mastercraft Electric, Inc. 86 FTE
CITY-NEAR Yakima Valley Hospital WA 2,748 FTE
CITY-NEAR Borton Fruit 1,473 FTE
CITY-NEAR Yakima County 997 FTE
CITY-NEAR Borton Orchards 918 FTE
NAT-TCR Crowne Plaza Los Angeles Harbor Hotel 17.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Amzl : Dfa2 17.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Tuff Shed Store 050 - Phoenix - SW 17.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Time Savers Services Corporation 17.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Apparatus, LLC 86 FTE
NAT-SIZE Eversource - Norwalk Elec 86 FTE
NAT-SIZE Orlando Utility Commission 86 FTE
NAT-SIZE VibraLife of Katy 86 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.