Blood derivative in-vitro diagnostic substances manufacturing · New York

Ortho Clinical Diagnostics B313

Rochester, NY · ~562 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.2
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Ortho Clinical Diagnostics B313 runs at 68% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Blood derivative in-vitro diagnostic substances manufacturing workplace, earning a grade B.

Ortho Clinical Diagnostics B313: 2.2 TCR = 68% of Blood derivative in-vitro diagnostic substances manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Ortho Clinical Diagnostics B313 safety composite

Ortho Clinical Diagnostics B313 scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 18%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

29/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 2.23 per 100 workers

Safer than 25% of industry peers

DART rate
F 2.11 per 100 workers

Safer than 18% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Ortho Clinical Diagnostics B313: 0.7 → 3.1 TCR

Peak year 2022 @ 3.1 TCR · DART/TCR 0.95× in 2022

Ortho Clinical Diagnostics B313's TCR rose 2.4 from 0.7 in 2019 to 3.1 in 2022. In 2022, DART was 0.95× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 325413 · Rochester, NY AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade B · TCR 2.2 · 68% of ind

  • DART 2.1 DART
  • RANK #12/14
  • PHOTO Streck Campus
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 42 inj
  • SIZE ~562 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Streck Campus (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · New York employers → · Look up another →

Ortho Clinical Diagnostics B313 in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Ortho Clinical Diagnostics B313 averages 2.2 TCR (68% of the Blood derivative in-vitro diagnostic substances manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Ortho Clinical Diagnostics B313 TCR series: 2019=0.7 · 2020=2.2 · 2021=3 · 2022=3.1 · BLS 3.3

Where Ortho Clinical Diagnostics B313 falls in its industry

201 Blood derivative in-vitro diag establishments

Safer than 25% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.4.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to New York alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #12 safest of 14 Blood derivative in-vitro diag employers in New York.

Ortho Clinical Diagnostics B313 (562 employees, TCR 2.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 120 employees and a TCR of 1.4 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02,0004,0006,000 01234 Average employees Total Case Rate Ortho Clinical Diagnostics B313
Ortho Clinical Diagnostics B313 (562 employees, TCR 2.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 120 employees and a TCR of 1.4

Ortho Clinical Diagnostics B313 has more employees than the Blood derivative in-vitro diagnostic sub median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.4. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 3.1 2.1 15 1 0
2021 3.0 1.8 13 4 0
2020 2.2 1.8 10 2 0
2019 0.7 0.5 4 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

325413 · NY · Rochester

201 Blood derivative in-vitro diagnostic substances manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 21,008 rated employers in New York with headcount on file · 956 employers in Rochester, NY · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Streck Campus 2.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Roche Molecular Systems Branchburg Site 2.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Instrumentation Laboratory 2.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR InBios International Inc. 307 Facility 2.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE Rochester 562 FTE
STATE-SIZE N Amityville NY 1500 New Horizons Blvd 562 FTE
STATE-SIZE 1849 - Atlantic Terminal 562 FTE
STATE-SIZE WM 1810 562 FTE
CITY-NEAR Division 50 University of Rochester 13,244 FTE
CITY-NEAR Rochester General Hospital 7,833 FTE
CITY-NEAR Division 40 University of Rochester 4,884 FTE
CITY-NEAR Unity Hospital 3,158 FTE
NAT-TCR Bio Springer North America Corporation 2.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Bryan, Texas 2.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Federal-Mogul Manitowoc 2.2 TCR
NAT-TCR S05397 - Southern Services Landfill 2.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE Loretto Hospital 562 FTE
NAT-SIZE Logan facility 562 FTE
NAT-SIZE Noble House Home Furnishings 562 FTE
NAT-SIZE Paris Plant 562 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.