Assisted Living Facility for the Elderly · Minnesota

Osseo Gardens Assisted Living

Osseo, MN · ~21 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
12.9
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Osseo Gardens Assisted Living runs at 340% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Assisted Living Facility for the Elderly workplace, earning a grade F.

Osseo Gardens Assisted Living: 12.9 TCR = 340% of Assisted Living Facility for the Elderly BLS 3.8 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Osseo Gardens Assisted Living safety composite

Osseo Gardens Assisted Living scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 18%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

33/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 12.92 per 100 workers

Safer than 18% of industry peers

DART rate
D 4.98 per 100 workers

Safer than 37% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−0.9

2018→2024

Osseo Gardens Assisted Living injury rate improved

Osseo Gardens Assisted Living's TCR fell 0.9 from 15.8 in 2018 to 14.9 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2019 at 23.3 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.39× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=15.8 · 2019=23.3 · 2021=4.6 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=18.8 · 2024=14.9

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Osseo, MN ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 12.9 · 340% of ind

  • DART 5.0 DART
  • RANK #198/240
  • PHOTO PSL-The Gardens at M…
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 11 inj
  • SIZE ~21 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: PSL-The Gardens at Marysville (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Minnesota employers → · Look up another →

Osseo Gardens Assisted Living in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Osseo Gardens Assisted Living averages 12.9 TCR (340% of the Assisted Living Facility for the Elderly BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Osseo Gardens Assisted Living TCR series: 2018=15.8 · 2019=23.3 · 2021=4.6 · 2022=0 · 2023=18.8 · 2024=14.9 · BLS 3.8

Where Osseo Gardens Assisted Living falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted Living Facility for t establishments

Safer than 18% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Minnesota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #198 safest of 240 Assisted Living Facility for t employers in Minnesota.

Osseo Gardens Assisted Living (21 employees, TCR 12.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Osseo Gardens Assisted Living
Osseo Gardens Assisted Living (21 employees, TCR 12.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

Osseo Gardens Assisted Living has fewer employees than the Assisted Living Facility for the Elderly median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 14.9 5.0 3 0 0
2023 18.8 18.8 0 4 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 4.6 4.6 1 0 0
2019 23.3 17.5 4 0 0
2018 15.8 5.3 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · MN · Osseo

6,510 Assisted Living Facility for the Elderly employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 15,828 rated employers in Minnesota with headcount on file · 27 employers in Osseo, MN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR PSL-The Gardens at Marysville 12.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Quail Park of Granbury 12.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Kirkwood Orange 12.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Highland Oaks 12.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE Winthrop Agronomy 21 FTE
STATE-SIZE Donahues Greenhouse 21 FTE
STATE-SIZE M7 21 FTE
STATE-SIZE MNLOG-SEL-SEL MN LOGISTICS' 21 FTE
CITY-NEAR 6458-OSSE 434 FTE
CITY-NEAR Osseo Senior High School 241 FTE
CITY-NEAR Osseo Senior High 237 FTE
CITY-NEAR Osseo Middle School 100 FTE
NAT-TCR Quincy Village 12.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Dickson Health & Rehab 12.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Goodwill CFL - Lake Nona 12.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Evergreen Place Supportive Living- Streator 12.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE Mineral Wells Service Center 21 FTE
NAT-SIZE Austin Powder Great Lakes, LLC - Columbus, IN 21 FTE
NAT-SIZE Ashley House AU-7 21 FTE
NAT-SIZE Colonial Chemical Solutions, Charlotte 21 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.