Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · Washington

PSL-The Gardens at Marysville

Marysville, WA · ~48 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
12.9
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

PSL-The Gardens at Marysville runs at 340% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade F.

PSL-The Gardens at Marysville: 12.9 TCR = 340% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

PSL-The Gardens at Marysville safety composite

PSL-The Gardens at Marysville scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 18%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

28/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 12.93 per 100 workers

Safer than 18% of industry peers

DART rate
F 7.04 per 100 workers

Safer than 25% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.5

2022→2024

PSL-The Gardens at Marysville injury rate improved

PSL-The Gardens at Marysville's TCR fell 2.5 from 16.6 in 2022 to 14.1 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 16.6 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.54× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2022=16.6 · 2023=8.1 · 2024=14.1

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Marysville, WA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 12.9 · 340% of ind

  • DART 7.0 DART
  • RANK #157/216
  • PHOTO Quail Park of Granbury
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 11 inj
  • SIZE ~48 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Quail Park of Granbury (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Washington employers → · Look up another →

PSL-The Gardens at Marysville in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows PSL-The Gardens at Marysville averages 12.9 TCR (340% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

PSL-The Gardens at Marysville TCR series: 2022=16.6 · 2023=8.1 · 2024=14.1 · BLS 3.8

Where PSL-The Gardens at Marysville falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 18% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Washington alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #157 safest of 216 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in Washington.

PSL-The Gardens at Marysville (48 employees, TCR 12.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate PSL-The Gardens at Marysville
PSL-The Gardens at Marysville (48 employees, TCR 12.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

PSL-The Gardens at Marysville has fewer employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 14.1 7.0 6 0 0
2023 8.1 2.7 3 0 0
2022 16.6 0.0 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · WA · Marysville

6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,147 rated employers in Washington with headcount on file · 67 employers in Marysville, WA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Quail Park of Granbury 12.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Highland Oaks 12.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Osseo Gardens Assisted Living 12.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR 10777 12.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE Cold Creek Vineyards #8 48 FTE
STATE-SIZE F/T Constellation 48 FTE
STATE-SIZE F/T Defender 48 FTE
STATE-SIZE Esperanza Ridge LLC 48 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 2595 327 FTE
CITY-NEAR City of Marysville, Washington 326 FTE
CITY-NEAR 0642 - MARYSVILLE WA WHSE 317 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 3801 312 FTE
NAT-TCR Park Rapids HWY 34 clinic 12.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Corona del Mar 11 12.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Trader Joe's 0169 Tigard 12.9 TCR
NAT-TCR St. Charles Store 12.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE Landmark Fabrication 48 FTE
NAT-SIZE 2010 East 15th Street 48 FTE
NAT-SIZE Holiday City Dc Bldg 323 - 3339 48 FTE
NAT-SIZE Terrys Heating and Air Conditioning ID, lLC 48 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.