Elevator/Escalator-Installation, Modernization, Maintenance, Service, and Repair · New York

Otis Elevator Company-Manhattan ESB

New York, NY · ~27 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
3.7
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Otis Elevator Company-Manhattan ESB runs at 133% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Elevator/Escalator-Installation, Modernization, Maintenance, Service, and Repair workplace, earning a grade D.

Otis Elevator Company-Manhattan ESB: 3.7 TCR = 133% of Elevator/Escalator-Installation, Modernization, Maintenance, Service, and Repair BLS 2.8 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Otis Elevator Company-Manhattan ESB safety composite

Otis Elevator Company-Manhattan ESB scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 75% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 25%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

49/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 3.71 per 100 workers

Safer than 25% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 75% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−9.9

2016→2019

Otis Elevator Company-Manhattan ESB injury rate improved

Otis Elevator Company-Manhattan ESB's TCR fell 9.9 from 9.9 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2019. Peak filing year was 2016 at 9.9 TCR. In 2019, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=9.9 · 2017=0.0 · 2018=4.9 · 2019=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 238290 · New York, NY ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 3.7 · 133% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #57/67
  • PHOTO Right Elevator
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 4 inj
  • SIZE ~27 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Right Elevator (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · New York employers → · Look up another →

Otis Elevator Company-Manhattan ESB in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Otis Elevator Company-Manhattan ESB averages 3.7 TCR (133% of the Elevator/Escalator-Installation, Modernization, Maintenance, Service, and Repair BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Otis Elevator Company-Manhattan ESB TCR series: 2016=9.9 · 2017=0 · 2018=4.9 · 2019=0 · BLS 2.8

Where Otis Elevator Company-Manhattan ESB falls in its industry

1,138 Elevator/Escalator-Installatio establishments

Safer than 25% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to New York alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #57 safest of 67 Elevator/Escalator-Installatio employers in New York.

Otis Elevator Company-Manhattan ESB (27 employees, TCR 3.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 52 employees and a TCR of 2.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Otis Elevator Company-Manhattan ESB
Otis Elevator Company-Manhattan ESB (27 employees, TCR 3.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 52 employees and a TCR of 2.0

Otis Elevator Company-Manhattan ESB has fewer employees than the Elevator/Escalator-Installation, Moderni median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 4.9 4.9 1 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 9.9 9.9 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

238290 · NY · New York

1,138 Elevator/Escalator-Installation, Modernization, Maintenance, Service, and Repair employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 21,008 rated employers in New York with headcount on file · 1,952 employers in New York, NY · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Right Elevator 3.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Diebold Nixdorf Sacramento CA 3.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR DFW Movers North Jobsites 3.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Aerocom Systems, LLC 3.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE Rick Minkus Farms 27 FTE
STATE-SIZE Highbanks Dairy 27 FTE
STATE-SIZE Van Slyke's Dairy Farm LLC 27 FTE
STATE-SIZE Synergy LLC 27 FTE
CITY-NEAR NYU Grossman School of Medicine 16,280 FTE
CITY-NEAR Memorial Hospital Corporation (MEM) 14,781 FTE
CITY-NEAR NYU Langone Hospitals 12,389 FTE
CITY-NEAR Mount Sinai Medical Center 11,845 FTE
NAT-TCR Antlers Early Head Start/Early Learning Center 3.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Bloomingdale Memory Care, LLC 3.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Dept. of Social Services 3.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Bandera Nursing and Rehab Center 3.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE Morningside of Riverchase 27 FTE
NAT-SIZE Public Works Department 27 FTE
NAT-SIZE Victory Packaging Phoenix 27 FTE
NAT-SIZE Peoria - 548 27 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.