Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities · Virginia

Our Lady of the Valley

Roanoke, VA · ~146 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
8.0
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Our Lady of the Valley runs at 210% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities workplace, earning a grade F.

Our Lady of the Valley: 8.0 TCR = 210% of Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities BLS 3.8 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Our Lady of the Valley safety composite

Our Lady of the Valley scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 72% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 42%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

55/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 7.99 per 100 workers

Safer than 42% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0.78 per 100 workers

Safer than 72% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−10.0

2019→2024

Our Lady of the Valley injury rate improved

Our Lady of the Valley's TCR fell 10.0 from 10.8 in 2019 to 0.8 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 15.9 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.1× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2019=10.8 · 2020=13.7 · 2021=6.6 · 2022=0.1 · 2023=15.9 · 2024=0.8

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623311 · Roanoke, VA ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 8.0 · 210% of ind

  • DART 0.8 DART
  • RANK #54/91
  • PHOTO Prairie Ridge Village
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 32 inj
  • SIZE ~146 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Prairie Ridge Village (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Virginia employers → · Look up another →

Our Lady of the Valley in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Our Lady of the Valley averages 8.0 TCR (210% of the Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Our Lady of the Valley TCR series: 2019=10.8 · 2020=13.7 · 2021=6.6 · 2022=0.1 · 2023=15.9 · 2024=0.8 · BLS 3.8

Where Our Lady of the Valley falls in its industry

4,127 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 42% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Virginia alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #54 safest of 91 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in Virginia.

Our Lady of the Valley (146 employees, TCR 8.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Our Lady of the Valley
Our Lady of the Valley (146 employees, TCR 8.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9

Our Lady of the Valley has more employees than the Assisted-living facilities with on-site median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.8 0.8 1 0 0
2023 15.9 15.9 0 20 0
2022 0.1 0.0 1 0 0
2021 6.6 1.9 7 0 0
2020 13.7 9.6 10 0 0
2019 10.8 2.5 13 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623311 · VA · Roanoke

4,127 Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,673 rated employers in Virginia with headcount on file · 415 employers in Roanoke, VA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Prairie Ridge Village 8.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Hickory Valley Retirement 8.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR The Enclave of East Louisville 8.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Cedarhurst Living, LLC - Arnold 8.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Ashworth Bros., Inc. 146 FTE
STATE-SIZE HAMPTON 146 FTE
STATE-SIZE 42671 - NORTH VIRGINIA ZONE 146 FTE
STATE-SIZE 1803 LOWE S OF CULPEPER VA 146 FTE
CITY-NEAR Carilion Clinic Co. 01 7,384 FTE
CITY-NEAR Roanoke City Public Schools 1,849 FTE
CITY-NEAR Other Location 1,808 FTE
CITY-NEAR Carilion Clinic Services Co. 13 1,753 FTE
NAT-TCR Geiger Ready Mix Plant 8 8.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Pottstown Tower Heal 8.0 TCR
NAT-TCR 15 - Orlando 8.0 TCR
NAT-TCR 0740 - Mary Esther 8.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Hanford Pharmaceuticals 146 FTE
NAT-SIZE United States Roofing Corporation 146 FTE
NAT-SIZE Phrg Den 146 FTE
NAT-SIZE CenterPoint Energy - Sugar Land 146 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.