Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities · Montana

Prairie Ridge Village

Glasgow, MT · ~30 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
8.0
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Prairie Ridge Village runs at 210% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities workplace, earning a grade F.

Prairie Ridge Village: 8.0 TCR = 210% of Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities BLS 3.8 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Prairie Ridge Village safety composite

Prairie Ridge Village scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 37%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

43/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 7.99 per 100 workers

Safer than 42% of industry peers

DART rate
D 4.89 per 100 workers

Safer than 37% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−17.7

2016→2024

Prairie Ridge Village injury rate improved

Prairie Ridge Village's TCR fell 17.7 from 22.6 in 2016 to 4.9 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2016 at 22.6 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.61× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=22.6 · 2018=0.0 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=10.5 · 2023=10.0 · 2024=4.9

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623311 · Glasgow, MT ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 8.0 · 210% of ind

  • DART 4.9 DART
  • RANK #6/27
  • PHOTO Our Lady of the Valley
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 9 inj
  • SIZE ~30 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Our Lady of the Valley (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Montana employers → · Look up another →

Prairie Ridge Village in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Prairie Ridge Village averages 8.0 TCR (210% of the Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Prairie Ridge Village TCR series: 2016=22.6 · 2018=0 · 2021=0 · 2022=10.5 · 2023=10 · 2024=4.9 · BLS 3.8

Where Prairie Ridge Village falls in its industry

4,127 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 42% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Montana alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #6 safest of 27 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in Montana.

Prairie Ridge Village (30 employees, TCR 8.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Prairie Ridge Village
Prairie Ridge Village (30 employees, TCR 8.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9

Prairie Ridge Village has fewer employees than the Assisted-living facilities with on-site median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 4.9 4.9 1 0 0
2023 10.0 0.0 2 0 0
2022 10.5 10.5 2 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 22.6 5.6 4 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623311 · MT · Glasgow

4,127 Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 1,536 rated employers in Montana with headcount on file · 12 employers in Glasgow, MT · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Our Lady of the Valley 8.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Hickory Valley Retirement 8.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR The Enclave of East Louisville 8.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Cedarhurst Living, LLC - Arnold 8.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Avista Noxon 30 FTE
STATE-SIZE Heorot Power Management - Hardin 30 FTE
STATE-SIZE Hammerquist Casalegno LLC 30 FTE
STATE-SIZE Central Heating Cooling Plumbing and Electrical 30 FTE
CITY-NEAR Frances Mahon Deaconess Hospital 263 FTE
CITY-NEAR Valley View Nursing Home 79 FTE
CITY-NEAR Reynolds Market-Glasgow 64 FTE
CITY-NEAR 4054-ABS-0030-0030-04012 46 FTE
NAT-TCR 091/Baybrook 8.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Pathways PACE-IPO 8.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Crown Nursery 8.0 TCR
NAT-TCR East Contra Costa Irrigation District 8.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Gladwin County Road Commission 30 FTE
NAT-SIZE Roofing Contractor 30 FTE
NAT-SIZE SAZ-Sierra Vista Office 0047-FAC27 30 FTE
NAT-SIZE Kitchen Depot of Huntington, Inc. 30 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2018, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.