Stainless steel made in iron and steel mills · Alabama

Outokumpu Stainless Steel USA

Calvert, AL · ~973 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.7
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Outokumpu Stainless Steel USA runs at 21% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Stainless steel made in iron and steel mills workplace, earning a grade A.

Outokumpu Stainless Steel USA: 0.7 TCR = 21% of Stainless steel made in iron and steel mills BLS 3.3 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Outokumpu Stainless Steel USA safety composite

Outokumpu Stainless Steel USA scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 91% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 53%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

70/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0.69 per 100 workers

Safer than 91% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0.71 per 100 workers

Safer than 59% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 53% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Outokumpu Stainless Steel USA held a steady TCR band

Outokumpu Stainless Steel USA's TCR held near 0.3 from 1.0 in 2018 to 0.7 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2020 at 1.1 TCR. In 2024, DART was 1.03× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=1.0 · 2019=0.5 · 2020=1.1 · 2021=0.4 · 2022=0.3 · 2023=0.9 · 2024=0.7

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 331110 · Calvert, AL AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 0.7 · 21% of ind

  • DART 0.7 DART
  • RANK #4/17
  • PHOTO Wheeling Machine Pro…
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 44 inj
  • SIZE ~973 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Wheeling Machine Products - Pine Bluff (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Alabama employers → · Look up another →

Outokumpu Stainless Steel USA in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Outokumpu Stainless Steel USA averages 0.7 TCR (21% of the Stainless steel made in iron and steel mills BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Outokumpu Stainless Steel USA TCR series: 2018=1 · 2019=0.5 · 2020=1.1 · 2021=0.4 · 2022=0.3 · 2023=0.9 · 2024=0.7 · BLS 3.3

Where Outokumpu Stainless Steel USA falls in its industry

416 Stainless steel made in iron a establishments

Safer than 91% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Alabama alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #4 safest of 17 Stainless steel made in iron a employers in Alabama.

Outokumpu Stainless Steel USA (973 employees, TCR 0.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 155 employees and a TCR of 2.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,0002,500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Outokumpu Stainless Steel USA
Outokumpu Stainless Steel USA (973 employees, TCR 0.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 155 employees and a TCR of 2.7

Outokumpu Stainless Steel USA has more employees than the Stainless steel made in iron and steel m median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.7 0.7 10 0 0
2023 0.9 0.3 9 0 0
2022 0.3 0.0 3 0 0
2021 0.4 0.1 4 0 0
2020 1.1 1.1 3 7 0
2019 0.5 0.3 5 0 0
2018 1.0 0.6 10 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

331110 · AL · Calvert

416 Stainless steel made in iron and steel mills employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,418 rated employers in Alabama with headcount on file · 6 employers in Calvert, AL · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Wheeling Machine Products - Pine Bluff 0.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Fairfield Tubular Operations 0.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Automotive Center 0.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Metals USA Liberty 0.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE Tiffin Motor Homes, Inc 975 FTE
STATE-SIZE VT Mobile Aerospace 962 FTE
STATE-SIZE MOBIS 952 FTE
STATE-SIZE Tiffin Motorhomes Inc 949 FTE
CITY-NEAR AM/NS Calvert 1,607 FTE
CITY-NEAR TMS Calvert 111 FTE
CITY-NEAR PVS Steel Services - Calvert 21 FTE
CITY-NEAR Outoukumpu 20 FTE
NAT-TCR Electric Operations Building 0.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Pima County Juvenile Court 0.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Kimball Electronics Indianapolis 0.7 TCR
NAT-TCR JBS 0.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE Eastern State Hospital 973 FTE
NAT-SIZE St Catherine Hospital 973 FTE
NAT-SIZE CLT1 973 FTE
NAT-SIZE Gibson 973 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.