Shampoos and conditioners, hair, manufacturing · Florida

Overmyer Plant

Jacksonville, FL · ~276 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
3.3
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Overmyer Plant runs at 101% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Shampoos and conditioners, hair, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade C.

Overmyer Plant: 3.3 TCR = 101% of Shampoos and conditioners, hair, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Overmyer Plant safety composite

Overmyer Plant scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 34%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

43/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 3.32 per 100 workers

Safer than 34% of industry peers

DART rate
D 1.22 per 100 workers

Safer than 49% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.1

2016→2023

Overmyer Plant injury rate improved

Overmyer Plant's TCR fell 1.1 from 2.8 in 2016 to 1.6 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2017 at 6.5 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0.37× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=2.8 · 2017=6.5 · 2018=5.1 · 2019=2.8 · 2020=2.4 · 2021=2.7 · 2022=2.6 · 2023=1.6

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 325620 · Jacksonville, FL ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade C · TCR 3.3 · 101% of ind

  • DART 1.2 DART
  • RANK #9/14
  • PHOTO Concept Laboratories
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 75 inj
  • SIZE ~276 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Concept Laboratories (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Florida employers → · Look up another →

Overmyer Plant in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Overmyer Plant averages 3.3 TCR (101% of the Shampoos and conditioners, hair, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Overmyer Plant TCR series: 2016=2.8 · 2017=6.5 · 2018=5.1 · 2019=2.8 · 2020=2.4 · 2021=2.7 · 2022=2.6 · 2023=1.6 · BLS 3.3

Where Overmyer Plant falls in its industry

260 Shampoos and conditioners, hai establishments

Safer than 34% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Florida alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #9 safest of 14 Shampoos and conditioners, hai employers in Florida.

Overmyer Plant (276 employees, TCR 3.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 161 employees and a TCR of 2.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Overmyer Plant
Overmyer Plant (276 employees, TCR 3.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 161 employees and a TCR of 2.3

Overmyer Plant has more employees than the Shampoos and conditioners, hair, manufac median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 1.6 1.2 4 0 0
2022 2.6 2.3 7 0 0
2021 2.7 2.7 7 0 0
2020 2.4 1.6 6 0 0
2019 2.8 1.4 8 0 0
2018 5.1 3.6 17 0 0
2017 6.5 5.0 17 0 0
2016 2.8 2.8 9 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

325620 · FL · Jacksonville

260 Shampoos and conditioners, hair, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 26,569 rated employers in Florida with headcount on file · 1,776 employers in Jacksonville, FL · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Concept Laboratories 3.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Liquid Technologies, Inc. 3.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Cellese, Inc. Headquarters 3.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Orlandi, Inc 3.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE North American Substation Services 276 FTE
STATE-SIZE B.R.W. Contracting, Inc. 276 FTE
STATE-SIZE Sofidel America HC 276 FTE
STATE-SIZE 0687 - Gainesville 276 FTE
CITY-NEAR UF HEALTH JACKSONVILLE 4,948 FTE
CITY-NEAR Mayo Clinic Jacksonville (Clinic) 4,567 FTE
CITY-NEAR Baptist Health System Jacksonville Baptist Medical Center 4,199 FTE
CITY-NEAR FLJAC - JACKSONVILLE 4,193 FTE
NAT-TCR Heavy Duty Rebuilders Supply 3.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Kowalski Construction Inc. 3.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Trudeau's Fence Company, Ltd. 3.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Reesman Service Corporation 3.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE ROMCO Equipment Co., LLC 276 FTE
NAT-SIZE amcor Healthcare Oshkosh 276 FTE
NAT-SIZE Bethany Home Society of San Joaq 276 FTE
NAT-SIZE AdvantageCare Home Health 276 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.