Motors, gear, manufacturing · Illinois

Overton Chicago Gear - Chicago

Chicago, IL · ~37 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
4.4
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Overton Chicago Gear - Chicago runs at 135% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Motors, gear, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade D.

Overton Chicago Gear - Chicago: 4.4 TCR = 135% of Motors, gear, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Overton Chicago Gear - Chicago safety composite

Overton Chicago Gear - Chicago scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 23%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

31/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 4.44 per 100 workers

Safer than 26% of industry peers

DART rate
F 3.01 per 100 workers

Safer than 23% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−4.4

2017→2023

Overton Chicago Gear - Chicago injury rate improved

Overton Chicago Gear - Chicago's TCR fell 4.4 from 7.4 in 2017 to 3.0 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2017 at 7.4 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0.68× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=7.4 · 2018=5.9 · 2019=6.5 · 2020=5.1 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=3.1 · 2023=3.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 333612 · Chicago, IL ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 4.4 · 135% of ind

  • DART 3.0 DART
  • RANK #13/15
  • PHOTO Penn Machine Company…
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 14 inj
  • SIZE ~37 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Penn Machine Company LLC - Blairsville Transit (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Illinois employers → · Look up another →

Overton Chicago Gear - Chicago in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Overton Chicago Gear - Chicago averages 4.4 TCR (135% of the Motors, gear, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Overton Chicago Gear - Chicago TCR series: 2017=7.4 · 2018=5.9 · 2019=6.5 · 2020=5.1 · 2021=0 · 2022=3.1 · 2023=3 · BLS 3.3

Where Overton Chicago Gear - Chicago falls in its industry

106 Motors, gear, manufacturing establishments

Safer than 26% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.1.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Illinois alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #13 safest of 15 Motors, gear, manufacturing employers in Illinois.

Overton Chicago Gear - Chicago (37 employees, TCR 4.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 86 employees and a TCR of 3.1 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Overton Chicago Gear - Chicago
Overton Chicago Gear - Chicago (37 employees, TCR 4.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 86 employees and a TCR of 3.1

Overton Chicago Gear - Chicago has fewer employees than the Motors, gear, manufacturing median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.1. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 3.0 3.0 1 0 0
2022 3.1 3.1 1 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 5.1 0.0 2 0 0
2019 6.5 6.5 3 0 0
2018 5.9 4.0 3 0 0
2017 7.4 7.4 4 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

333612 · IL · Chicago

106 Motors, gear, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,804 rated employers in Illinois with headcount on file · 2,934 employers in Chicago, IL · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Penn Machine Company LLC - Blairsville Transit 4.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Niagara Gear Corporation 4.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Avon Gear & Engineering Co 4.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR SEW Eurodrive Lyman Manufacturing 4.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Curtis Orchard Ltd 37 FTE
STATE-SIZE Tuscola 37 FTE
STATE-SIZE Lewis Seed Farms, Inc. - Ursa 37 FTE
STATE-SIZE Aurora Fleet Facility 37 FTE
CITY-NEAR Chicago Public Schools 49,500 FTE
CITY-NEAR Chicago/Corporate 18,831 FTE
CITY-NEAR University of Illinois at Chicago 13,092 FTE
CITY-NEAR University Health Service UIC UIC Campus 12,732 FTE
NAT-TCR Le Center K-8 4.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Uss Upi 4.4 TCR
NAT-TCR American House - Hendersonville 4.4 TCR
NAT-TCR GM Construction, INc. 4.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE Pittsburgh 37 FTE
NAT-SIZE THUSA Coffee company,Inc 37 FTE
NAT-SIZE Centennial Plastics, Inc. 37 FTE
NAT-SIZE Clark Hunt Construction, Inc. 37 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.