Commercial building construction general contractors · Pennsylvania

Pittsburgh

Jefferson Hills, PA · ~37 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
9.4
Avg TCR
2.9
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Pittsburgh runs at 323% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Commercial building construction general contractors workplace, earning a grade F.

Pittsburgh: 9.4 TCR = 323% of Commercial building construction general contractors BLS 2.9 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Pittsburgh safety composite

Pittsburgh scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 73% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 7%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

41/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 9.38 per 100 workers

Safer than 7% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 73% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−8.5

2016→2023

Pittsburgh injury rate improved

Pittsburgh's TCR fell 8.5 from 8.5 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2018 at 20.9 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=8.5 · 2017=9.8 · 2018=20.9 · 2019=13.7 · 2020=3.3 · 2021=8.0 · 2022=11.0 · 2023=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 236220 · Jefferson Hills, PA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 9.4 · 323% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #234/251
  • PHOTO Gray Construction Co
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 26 inj
  • SIZE ~37 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Gray Construction Co (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Pennsylvania employers → · Look up another →

Pittsburgh in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Pittsburgh averages 9.4 TCR (323% of the Commercial building construction general contractors BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Pittsburgh TCR series: 2016=8.5 · 2017=9.8 · 2018=20.9 · 2019=13.7 · 2020=3.3 · 2021=8 · 2022=11 · 2023=0 · BLS 2.9

Where Pittsburgh falls in its industry

4,692 Commercial building constructi establishments

Safer than 7% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Pennsylvania alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #234 safest of 251 Commercial building constructi employers in Pennsylvania.

Pittsburgh (37 employees, TCR 9.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 2.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Pittsburgh
Pittsburgh (37 employees, TCR 9.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 2.3

Pittsburgh has fewer employees than the Commercial building construction general median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 11.0 5.5 2 0 0
2021 8.0 8.0 2 0 0
2020 3.3 0.0 1 0 0
2019 13.7 13.7 5 0 0
2018 20.9 15.7 8 0 0
2017 9.8 2.4 4 0 0
2016 8.5 4.3 4 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

236220 · PA · Jefferson Hills

4,692 Commercial building construction general contractors employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,692 rated employers in Pennsylvania with headcount on file · 11 employers in Jefferson Hills, PA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Gray Construction Co 9.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Randall Engineered Wall System 9.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR GCM Contracting Solutions, Inc. 9.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR TCM Renovations 9.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE Packing 37 FTE
STATE-SIZE Packing House 37 FTE
STATE-SIZE Adams Electric Cooperative Inc. Headquarters Office 37 FTE
STATE-SIZE Claverack REC - Wysox 37 FTE
CITY-NEAR Kurt J Lesker Company 259 FTE
CITY-NEAR KJLC Building #2 258 FTE
CITY-NEAR Synthomer Jefferson Hills LLC 226 FTE
CITY-NEAR BAW PLASTICS INC 131 FTE
NAT-TCR Lake Ridge Senior Living 9.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Dragon Products Center 9.4 TCR
NAT-TCR St. Joseph Medical Center 9.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Beltrami County Law Enforcement Center 9.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE Overton Chicago Gear - Chicago 37 FTE
NAT-SIZE THUSA Coffee company,Inc 37 FTE
NAT-SIZE Clark Hunt Construction, Inc. 37 FTE
NAT-SIZE Centennial Plastics, Inc. 37 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.