Sheriffs' offices (except court functions only) · Tennessee

Overton County Sheriffs Department

Livingston, TN · ~61 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
22.1
Avg TCR
3.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Overton County Sheriffs Department runs at 692% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Sheriffs' offices (except court functions only) workplace, earning a grade F.

Overton County Sheriffs Department: 22.1 TCR = 692% of Sheriffs' offices (except court functions only) BLS 3.2 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Overton County Sheriffs Department safety composite

Overton County Sheriffs Department scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 53% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 5%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

29/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 22.14 per 100 workers

Safer than 5% of industry peers

DART rate
D 5.28 per 100 workers

Safer than 40% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 53% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Overton County Sheriffs Department: 10.0 → 34.3 TCR

Peak year 2017 @ 34.3 TCR · DART/TCR 0.24× in 2017

Overton County Sheriffs Department's TCR rose 24.3 from 10.0 in 2016 to 34.3 in 2017. In 2017, DART was 0.24× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 922120 · Livingston, TN ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 22.1 · 692% of ind

  • DART 5.3 DART
  • RANK #9/9
  • PHOTO Los Angeles Police D…
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 20 inj
  • SIZE ~61 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Los Angeles Police Department, Devonshirel Division (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Tennessee employers → · Look up another →

Overton County Sheriffs Department in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Overton County Sheriffs Department averages 22.1 TCR (692% of the Sheriffs' offices (except court functions only) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Overton County Sheriffs Department TCR series: 2016=10 · 2017=34.3 · BLS 3.2

Where Overton County Sheriffs Department falls in its industry

716 Sheriffs' offices (except cour establishments

Safer than 5% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 9.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Tennessee alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #9 safest of 9 Sheriffs' offices (except cour employers in Tennessee.

Overton County Sheriffs Department (61 employees, TCR 22.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 95 employees and a TCR of 9.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600 0102030 Average employees Total Case Rate Overton County Sheriffs Department
Overton County Sheriffs Department (61 employees, TCR 22.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 95 employees and a TCR of 9.5

Overton County Sheriffs Department has fewer employees than the Sheriffs' offices (except court function median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 9.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2017 34.3 5.3 12 1 0
2016 10.0 0.0 8 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

922120 · TN · Livingston

716 Sheriffs' offices (except court functions only) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,743 rated employers in Tennessee with headcount on file · 25 employers in Livingston, TN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Los Angeles Police Department, Devonshirel Division 22.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR U.S. Border Patrol Sector - Big Bend 22.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR OCSD South East Operations 22.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR City of Albany Police Station 22.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE CORPORATE OFFICE 61 FTE
STATE-SIZE Tri-State Utility Construction, LLC 61 FTE
STATE-SIZE JOB 230B 61 FTE
STATE-SIZE Blount County Highway Dept 61 FTE
CITY-NEAR Livingston Regional Hospital 296 FTE
CITY-NEAR S0358 LIVINGSTON REG. HOSP 263 FTE
CITY-NEAR Engineered Materials : Livingston 256 FTE
CITY-NEAR Parker Livingston TN 254 FTE
NAT-TCR 5472-NAI-0033-0033-00121 22.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Exactech, Inc 22.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Arecibo 22.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Jayhawk Logistics, Inc. 22.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE N and R of South Kansas City LLC 61 FTE
NAT-SIZE N and R of Smithville LLC 61 FTE
NAT-SIZE Kimber Mfg., Inc. 161 Railroad 61 FTE
NAT-SIZE 532 Greenville 61 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.