Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · Pennsylvania

Oxford Personal Care

Langhorne, PA · ~73 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
17.5
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Oxford Personal Care runs at 461% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade F.

Oxford Personal Care: 17.5 TCR = 461% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Oxford Personal Care safety composite

Oxford Personal Care scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 8%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

22/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 17.53 per 100 workers

Safer than 8% of industry peers

DART rate
F 9.19 per 100 workers

Safer than 17% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−9.9

2021→2024

Oxford Personal Care injury rate improved

Oxford Personal Care's TCR fell 9.9 from 22.7 in 2021 to 12.9 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2021 at 22.7 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.52× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2021=22.7 · 2022=13.8 · 2023=20.7 · 2024=12.9

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Langhorne, PA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 17.5 · 461% of ind

  • DART 9.2 DART
  • RANK #218/233
  • PHOTO Shire Senior Living
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 26 inj
  • SIZE ~73 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Shire Senior Living (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Pennsylvania employers → · Look up another →

Oxford Personal Care in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Oxford Personal Care averages 17.5 TCR (461% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Oxford Personal Care TCR series: 2021=22.7 · 2022=13.8 · 2023=20.7 · 2024=12.9 · BLS 3.8

Where Oxford Personal Care falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 8% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Pennsylvania alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #218 safest of 233 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in Pennsylvania.

Oxford Personal Care (73 employees, TCR 17.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Oxford Personal Care
Oxford Personal Care (73 employees, TCR 17.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

Oxford Personal Care has more employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 12.9 9.2 7 0 0
2023 20.7 18.8 11 0 0
2022 13.8 5.9 7 0 0
2021 22.7 22.7 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · PA · Langhorne

6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,692 rated employers in Pennsylvania with headcount on file · 107 employers in Langhorne, PA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Shire Senior Living 17.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR AB-HHH2-SPRING ARBOR ALBEMARLE 17.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR VILLAGE AT PRINEVILLE 17.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Cornerstone at Canton 17.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE NRG Energy - Seward Generating Station 73 FTE
STATE-SIZE McMurray Operations 73 FTE
STATE-SIZE Philly Schuylkill 73 FTE
STATE-SIZE Wohlsen Construction Self Perform 73 FTE
CITY-NEAR St. Mary Medical Center 2,583 FTE
CITY-NEAR Woods Services 2,111 FTE
CITY-NEAR St. Mary Medical Center Hospital Langhorne-SMMC-PA 1,998 FTE
CITY-NEAR 42-018114074-8 1,484 FTE
NAT-TCR Total Comfort Solutions, LLC 17.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Bartels Lutheran Retirement Community 17.5 TCR
NAT-TCR The Track Gulf Shores 17.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Oregon Warehouse 17.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE 2004 Loop 375 Widening 73 FTE
NAT-SIZE Christus Schumpert Highland - EVS 73 FTE
NAT-SIZE Fontana, CA - 10641 Calabash 73 FTE
NAT-SIZE WTM - Las Vegas Nevada 73 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.