623210 Residential Intellectual and Developmental Disability Facilities · Pennsylvania

Woods Services

Langhorne, PA · ~2,111 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
9.0
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Woods Services runs at 237% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical 623210 Residential Intellectual and Developmental Disability Facilities workplace, earning a grade F.

Woods Services: 9.0 TCR = 237% of 623210 Residential Intellectual and Developmental Disability Facilities BLS 3.8 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Woods Services safety composite

Woods Services scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 25%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

33/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 9.02 per 100 workers

Safer than 29% of industry peers

DART rate
F 6.38 per 100 workers

Safer than 25% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.2

2016→2024

Woods Services injury rate improved

Woods Services's TCR fell 2.2 from 8.6 in 2016 to 6.4 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2020 at 10.8 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.71× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=8.6 · 2017=10.8 · 2019=8.6 · 2020=10.8 · 2024=6.4

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623210 · Langhorne, PA ABOVE-IND · LARGE

Grade F · TCR 9.0 · 237% of ind

  • DART 6.4 DART
  • RANK #89/121
  • PHOTO ABLE, Inc
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 836 inj
  • SIZE ~2,111 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: ABLE, Inc (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Pennsylvania employers → · Look up another →

Woods Services in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Woods Services averages 9.0 TCR (237% of the 623210 Residential Intellectual and Developmental Disability Facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Woods Services TCR series: 2016=8.6 · 2017=10.8 · 2019=8.6 · 2020=10.8 · 2024=6.4 · BLS 3.8

Where Woods Services falls in its industry

2,261 623210 Residential Intellectua establishments

Safer than 29% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Pennsylvania alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #89 safest of 121 623210 Residential Intellectua employers in Pennsylvania.

Woods Services (2,111 employees, TCR 9.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 65 employees and a TCR of 5.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,0002,500 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Woods Services
Woods Services (2,111 employees, TCR 9.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 65 employees and a TCR of 5.8

Woods Services has more employees than the 623210 Residential Intellectual and Deve median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 6.4 6.4 105 0 0
2020 10.8 9.2 197 0 0
2019 8.6 8.5 187 0 0
2017 10.8 10.4 189 2 0
2016 8.6 7.8 158 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623210 · PA · Langhorne

2,261 623210 Residential Intellectual and Developmental Disability Facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,692 rated employers in Pennsylvania with headcount on file · 107 employers in Langhorne, PA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR ABLE, Inc 9.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Beecher 9.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR ViaQuest Residential Services - Dayton 9.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Easterseals Arkansas - OSB 9.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE 4087 2,105 FTE
STATE-SIZE Air Products and Chemicals Inc.- Main Campus 2,118 FTE
STATE-SIZE Amazon.com Services LLC - RDG1 2,119 FTE
STATE-SIZE Hatfield Facility 2,102 FTE
CITY-NEAR St. Mary Medical Center 2,583 FTE
CITY-NEAR St. Mary Medical Center Hospital Langhorne-SMMC-PA 1,998 FTE
CITY-NEAR 42-018114074-8 1,484 FTE
CITY-NEAR Sesame Place (SPL) 1,116 FTE
NAT-TCR College Park 9.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Fairmont WV 9.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Metalor Technologies 9.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Piedmont Assisted Living Services, LLC 9.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Jacksons Food Stores 2,110 FTE
NAT-SIZE Ermco Components, Inc. 2,113 FTE
NAT-SIZE Swift Pork Company Worthington 2,113 FTE
NAT-SIZE Chevron North America Exploration and Production Company Gulf of Mexico 2,113 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2020, 2019, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.