Addition, alteration and renovation for-sale builders, commercial and institutional building · California

Oyster Point Phase 1D

Burlingame, CA · ~53 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.9
Avg TCR
2.9
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Oyster Point Phase 1D runs at 32% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Addition, alteration and renovation for-sale builders, commercial and institutional building workplace, earning a grade A.

Oyster Point Phase 1D: 0.9 TCR = 32% of Addition, alteration and renovation for-sale builders, commercial and institutional building BLS 2.9 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Oyster Point Phase 1D safety composite

Oyster Point Phase 1D scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 79% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

70/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 0.94 per 100 workers

Safer than 79% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 73% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Oyster Point Phase 1D held a steady TCR band

Oyster Point Phase 1D's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2020 to 0.0 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2021 at 2.8 TCR. In 2022, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2020=0.0 · 2021=2.8 · 2022=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 236220 · Burlingame, CA AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 0.9 · 32% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #86/486
  • PHOTO The Redmond Company
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 1 inj
  • SIZE ~53 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: The Redmond Company (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Oyster Point Phase 1D in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Oyster Point Phase 1D averages 0.9 TCR (32% of the Addition, alteration and renovation for-sale builders, commercial and institutional building BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Oyster Point Phase 1D TCR series: 2020=0 · 2021=2.8 · 2022=0 · BLS 2.9

Where Oyster Point Phase 1D falls in its industry

4,692 Addition, alteration and renov establishments

Safer than 79% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #86 safest of 486 Addition, alteration and renov employers in California.

Oyster Point Phase 1D (53 employees, TCR 0.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 2.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 02468 Average employees Total Case Rate Oyster Point Phase 1D
Oyster Point Phase 1D (53 employees, TCR 0.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 2.3

Oyster Point Phase 1D has fewer employees than the Addition, alteration and renovation for- median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 2.8 2.8 1 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

236220 · CA · Burlingame

4,692 Addition, alteration and renovation for-sale builders, commercial and institutional building employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 93 employers in Burlingame, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR The Redmond Company 0.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Melvin Mark Brokerage Company 0.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Merit Construction, Inc. 0.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Harvey-Cleary Builders - San Antonio 0.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE P-R Farms 53 FTE
STATE-SIZE LRC LABOR SERVICES INC 53 FTE
STATE-SIZE Acemi Nursery 53 FTE
STATE-SIZE Ball Tagawa Growers 53 FTE
CITY-NEAR Mills-Peninsula Medical Center (360-22) 1,835 FTE
CITY-NEAR Sutter Bay Hospitals (30191) 1,765 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2453-00060388-60388 909 FTE
CITY-NEAR SFO-SPUSA 512 FTE
NAT-TCR TAC Air - BDL 0.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Elliott Aviation of Minneapolis 0.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Northern States Metals Company 0.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Hearthside Food Solutions H5 0.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE Tops #598 53 FTE
NAT-SIZE Tops #589 53 FTE
NAT-SIZE Tops #371 53 FTE
NAT-SIZE Windom Area Central 53 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2020. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.