Utility line (i.e., sewer, water), construction · Massachusetts

P. Gioioso and Sons, Inc.

Hyde Park, MA · ~135 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
3.9
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
1
Fatality
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

P. Gioioso and Sons, Inc. runs at 138% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Utility line (i.e., sewer, water), construction workplace, earning a grade D.

P. Gioioso and Sons, Inc.: 3.9 TCR = 138% of Utility line (i.e., sewer, water), construction BLS 2.8 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

P. Gioioso and Sons, Inc. safety composite

P. Gioioso and Sons, Inc. scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 52% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 2%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

34/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 3.86 per 100 workers

Safer than 38% of industry peers

DART rate
D 0.74 per 100 workers

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Fatalities
F 1

Safer than 2% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.3

2016→2023

P. Gioioso and Sons, Inc. injury rate improved

P. Gioioso and Sons, Inc.'s TCR fell 1.3 from 2.7 in 2016 to 1.5 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2017 at 8.1 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0.19× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=2.7 · 2017=8.1 · 2018=5.1 · 2020=4.8 · 2021=4.1 · 2022=0.8 · 2023=1.5

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 237110 · Hyde Park, MA ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 3.9 · 138% of ind

  • DART 0.7 DART
  • RANK #13/27
  • PHOTO Public Works (old)
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 32 inj
  • SIZE ~135 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Public Works (old) (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Massachusetts employers → · Look up another →

P. Gioioso and Sons, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows P. Gioioso and Sons, Inc. averages 3.9 TCR (138% of the Utility line (i.e., sewer, water), construction BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

P. Gioioso and Sons, Inc. TCR series: 2016=2.7 · 2017=8.1 · 2018=5.1 · 2020=4.8 · 2021=4.1 · 2022=0.8 · 2023=1.5 · BLS 2.8

Where P. Gioioso and Sons, Inc. falls in its industry

1,614 Utility line (i.e., sewer, wat establishments

Safer than 38% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Massachusetts alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #13 safest of 27 Utility line (i.e., sewer, wat employers in Massachusetts.

P. Gioioso and Sons, Inc. (135 employees, TCR 3.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 54 employees and a TCR of 3.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate P. Gioioso and Sons, Inc.
P. Gioioso and Sons, Inc. (135 employees, TCR 3.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 54 employees and a TCR of 3.0

P. Gioioso and Sons, Inc. has more employees than the Utility line (i.e., sewer, water), const median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 1.5 0.7 1 1 0
2022 0.8 0.0 1 0 0
2021 4.1 2.5 5 0 0
2020 4.8 1.4 7 0 0
2018 5.1 3.4 6 0 1
2017 8.1 5.7 9 1 0
2016 2.7 2.7 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

237110 · MA · Hyde Park

1,614 Utility line (i.e., sewer, water), construction employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,108 rated employers in Massachusetts with headcount on file · 21 employers in Hyde Park, MA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Public Works (old) 3.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Underground Pipeline Rehabilitation, Inc. 3.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Big Mountain Enterprises, LLC 3.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Webb Boring LLC 3.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE Charles Services 135 FTE
STATE-SIZE Kala Pharmaceuticals, Inc. 135 FTE
STATE-SIZE Rexa Inc. 135 FTE
STATE-SIZE AFC Cable Systems 135 FTE
CITY-NEAR 605 READVILLE 340 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2662-7010 339 FTE
CITY-NEAR 7010 TRANSIT REGION-BOSTON MA 324 FTE
CITY-NEAR 6091-605 318 FTE
NAT-TCR Building 16 3.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Blattner Steel Co 3.9 TCR
NAT-TCR True Line Coring & Cutting of Tennessee 3.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Silgan Plastics 3.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE Orem #076 135 FTE
NAT-SIZE Portland Water Bureau Operations 135 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sisters of Charity of Nazareth 135 FTE
NAT-SIZE Premier Roofing Co. 135 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.