Metals service centers · New York

Pacemaker Steel and Piping Co.,Inc.

Utica, NY · ~68 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
4.8
Avg TCR
2.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Pacemaker Steel and Piping Co.,Inc. runs at 216% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Metals service centers workplace, earning a grade F.

Pacemaker Steel and Piping Co.,Inc.: 4.8 TCR = 216% of Metals service centers BLS 2.2 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Pacemaker Steel and Piping Co.,Inc. safety composite

Pacemaker Steel and Piping Co.,Inc. scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 13%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

32/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 4.76 per 100 workers

Safer than 37% of industry peers

DART rate
F 6.5 per 100 workers

Safer than 13% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−4.6

2016→2024

Pacemaker Steel and Piping Co.,Inc. injury rate improved

Pacemaker Steel and Piping Co.,Inc.'s TCR fell 4.6 from 11.1 in 2016 to 6.5 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2016 at 11.1 TCR. In 2024, DART was 1.37× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=11.1 · 2017=2.3 · 2018=4.4 · 2019=2.2 · 2020=2.2 · 2021=5.8 · 2022=4.2 · 2023=4.1 · 2024=6.5

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 423510 · Utica, NY ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 4.8 · 216% of ind

  • DART 6.5 DART
  • RANK #7/20
  • PHOTO Gottlieb Inc.
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 28 inj
  • SIZE ~68 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Gottlieb Inc. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · New York employers → · Look up another →

Pacemaker Steel and Piping Co.,Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Pacemaker Steel and Piping Co.,Inc. averages 4.8 TCR (216% of the Metals service centers BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Pacemaker Steel and Piping Co.,Inc. TCR series: 2016=11.1 · 2017=2.3 · 2018=4.4 · 2019=2.2 · 2020=2.2 · 2021=5.8 · 2022=4.2 · 2023=4.1 · 2024=6.5 · BLS 2.2

Where Pacemaker Steel and Piping Co.,Inc. falls in its industry

1,299 Metals service centers establishments

Safer than 37% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to New York alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #7 safest of 20 Metals service centers employers in New York.

Pacemaker Steel and Piping Co.,Inc. (68 employees, TCR 4.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 45 employees and a TCR of 3.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Pacemaker Steel and Piping Co.,Inc.
Pacemaker Steel and Piping Co.,Inc. (68 employees, TCR 4.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 45 employees and a TCR of 3.7

Pacemaker Steel and Piping Co.,Inc. has more employees than the Metals service centers median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 6.5 6.5 3 0 0
2023 4.1 4.1 2 0 0
2022 4.2 4.2 2 0 0
2021 5.8 3.9 3 0 0
2020 2.2 2.2 2 0 0
2019 2.2 2.2 2 0 0
2018 4.4 4.4 4 0 0
2017 2.3 1.1 2 0 0
2016 11.1 9.7 8 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

423510 · NY · Utica

1,299 Metals service centers employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 21,008 rated employers in New York with headcount on file · 148 employers in Utica, NY · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Gottlieb Inc. 4.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR JMS Russel Metals Corp - Trenton 4.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Hagan & Stone Wholesale, Inc. 4.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Location #10 4.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE Sunnyside Farms, Inc. 68 FTE
STATE-SIZE Bridgewater Farms LLC 68 FTE
STATE-SIZE CURTIN DAIRY 68 FTE
STATE-SIZE Stauffer Farms LLC 68 FTE
CITY-NEAR Resource Center for Independent Living 3,351 FTE
CITY-NEAR Faxton St. Lukes 1,727 FTE
CITY-NEAR St Elizabeth Medical Center 1,324 FTE
CITY-NEAR Utica University 915 FTE
NAT-TCR NH Road Crews and Installation 4.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Rehabilitation Center of Hampton 4.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Holsum Irish Dairy 4.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Armada Rubber Manufacturing Company 4.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE Hearne Distribution Center 68 FTE
NAT-SIZE Faraday 68 FTE
NAT-SIZE M. Braun, Inc. 68 FTE
NAT-SIZE City of Manistee 68 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.