Doors, wood and covered wood, manufacturing · Oregon

Pacific Architectural Wood Products, Inc.

Portland, OR · ~47 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
13.2
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Pacific Architectural Wood Products, Inc. runs at 401% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Doors, wood and covered wood, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade F.

Pacific Architectural Wood Products, Inc.: 13.2 TCR = 401% of Doors, wood and covered wood, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Pacific Architectural Wood Products, Inc. safety composite

Pacific Architectural Wood Products, Inc. scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 1%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

15/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 13.23 per 100 workers

Safer than 5% of industry peers

DART rate
F 13.6 per 100 workers

Safer than 1% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Pacific Architectural Wood Products, Inc.: 9.5 → 23.3 TCR

Peak year 2022 @ 23.3 TCR · DART/TCR 1.03× in 2022

Pacific Architectural Wood Products, Inc.'s TCR rose 13.8 from 9.5 in 2016 to 23.3 in 2022. In 2022, DART was 1.03× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 321911 · Portland, OR ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 13.2 · 401% of ind

  • DART 13.6 DART
  • RANK #21/24
  • PHOTO Olathe Millwork, LLC
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 18 inj
  • SIZE ~47 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Olathe Millwork, LLC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Oregon employers → · Look up another →

Pacific Architectural Wood Products, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Pacific Architectural Wood Products, Inc. averages 13.2 TCR (401% of the Doors, wood and covered wood, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Pacific Architectural Wood Products, Inc. TCR series: 2016=9.5 · 2017=6.9 · 2022=23.3 · BLS 3.3

Where Pacific Architectural Wood Products, Inc. falls in its industry

452 Doors, wood and covered wood, establishments

Safer than 5% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Oregon alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #21 safest of 24 Doors, wood and covered wood, employers in Oregon.

Pacific Architectural Wood Products, Inc. (47 employees, TCR 13.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 97 employees and a TCR of 5.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,000 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Pacific Architectural Wood Products, Inc.
Pacific Architectural Wood Products, Inc. (47 employees, TCR 13.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 97 employees and a TCR of 5.0

Pacific Architectural Wood Products, Inc. has fewer employees than the Doors, wood and covered wood, manufactur median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 23.3 13.6 11 1 0
2017 6.9 4.6 3 0 0
2016 9.5 7.1 4 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

321911 · OR · Portland

452 Doors, wood and covered wood, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 8,031 rated employers in Oregon with headcount on file · 1,728 employers in Portland, OR · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Olathe Millwork, LLC 13.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Castile Facility 13.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR CODEL Puyallup 13.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR 0673 - ABS - Mfg. Sacramento 13.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE 00463 ROSEBURG CUST SVC CNTR 47 FTE
STATE-SIZE Salem Electric 47 FTE
STATE-SIZE Northern Operations Center 47 FTE
STATE-SIZE Pahlisch Commercial Inc 47 FTE
CITY-NEAR OHSU Main Campus 18,003 FTE
CITY-NEAR OR349 PROVIDENCE ST VINCENT MEDICAL CTR-PORTLA 4,033 FTE
CITY-NEAR OR346 PROVIDENCE PORTLAND MEDICAL CTR-PORTLAND 3,684 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2252-00000530 3,498 FTE
NAT-TCR Store 1113 13.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Store 0579 13.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Cascades at Orchard Park 13.2 TCR
NAT-TCR 6962-SWY-0029-0029-03280 13.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE 243X/IY-Enterprise Remarketing 47 FTE
NAT-SIZE Pbs Ct 47 FTE
NAT-SIZE Lodi Canning Company 47 FTE
NAT-SIZE Seaboard Energy, LLC 47 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.