Airport passenger screening security services · Washington

Pacific Aviation - Seattle-Tacoma

Seatac, WA · ~24 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.4
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Pacific Aviation - Seattle-Tacoma runs at 53% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Airport passenger screening security services workplace, earning a grade B.

Pacific Aviation - Seattle-Tacoma: 2.4 TCR = 53% of Airport passenger screening security services BLS 4.5 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Pacific Aviation - Seattle-Tacoma safety composite

Pacific Aviation - Seattle-Tacoma scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 81% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

66/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 2.4 per 100 workers

Safer than 63% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 81% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Pacific Aviation - Seattle-Tacoma: 0.0 → 4.8 TCR

Peak year 2024 @ 4.8 TCR · DART/TCR 0× in 2024

Pacific Aviation - Seattle-Tacoma's TCR rose 4.8 from 0.0 in 2023 to 4.8 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 488190 · Seatac, WA AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 2.4 · 53% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #6/19
  • PHOTO Solo Aviation, Inc.
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 1 inj
  • SIZE ~24 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Solo Aviation, Inc. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Washington employers → · Look up another →

Pacific Aviation - Seattle-Tacoma in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Pacific Aviation - Seattle-Tacoma averages 2.4 TCR (53% of the Airport passenger screening security services BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Pacific Aviation - Seattle-Tacoma TCR series: 2023=0 · 2024=4.8 · BLS 4.5

Where Pacific Aviation - Seattle-Tacoma falls in its industry

992 Airport passenger screening se establishments

Safer than 63% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Washington alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #6 safest of 19 Airport passenger screening se employers in Washington.

Pacific Aviation - Seattle-Tacoma (24 employees, TCR 2.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 67 employees and a TCR of 3.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Pacific Aviation - Seattle-Tacoma
Pacific Aviation - Seattle-Tacoma (24 employees, TCR 2.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 67 employees and a TCR of 3.2

Pacific Aviation - Seattle-Tacoma has fewer employees than the Airport passenger screening security ser median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 4.8 0.0 1 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

488190 · WA · Seatac

992 Airport passenger screening security services employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,147 rated employers in Washington with headcount on file · 50 employers in Seatac, WA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Solo Aviation, Inc. 2.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Gama Aviation Engineering (VNY) 2.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR 26 - HELO MX FE WARREN AFB UH-1, WY 2.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR JBT AeroTech Corporation Airport Services IAD 2.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE Krainick Dairy LLC 24 FTE
STATE-SIZE View Point Dairy 24 FTE
STATE-SIZE Pacific Shellfish Grays Harbor LLC 24 FTE
STATE-SIZE Olympia Yard 24 FTE
CITY-NEAR Unifi Aviation Services : SEA - Seattle 1,227 FTE
CITY-NEAR Amazon.com Services LLC - BFI8 497 FTE
CITY-NEAR National Alamo 45B2 45B4 246 FTE
CITY-NEAR National 45B4 Alamo 45B2 235 FTE
NAT-TCR A & B Painting, Inc. 2.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Fort Worth Botanic Garden 2.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Continental Mirrored Graphics, Inc. 2.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Wildfire Defense Systems, Inc 2.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE Flint Equipment Company Ag Turf - Cordele 24 FTE
NAT-SIZE Reliance Steel Company 24 FTE
NAT-SIZE Bowe Contractors Inc. 24 FTE
NAT-SIZE The Grove Assisted Living 24 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.